Judges accused of £12.6m legal aid scam appear in court


Westminster Magistrates’ Court: First court appearance

Three judges and six other lawyers arrested over an alleged plot to scam £12.6m from the legal aid system have appeared in court.

Part-time immigration judges Kareena Maciel, 46, and Rasib Ghaffar, 48, along with part-time civil judge Razi Shah are accused of making claims in excess of £12.6m.

The others charged are legal clerk Gazi Khan, 49, barrister Shahid Rashid, 57 and solicitors Joseph Ameyaw-Kyeremeh, 67, Azhar Khan, 46, Lloyd Moody, 48 and Samira Bashir, 46.

Gazi Khan stood up and claimed the case was a “racist witch hunt”, adding: “It will all come out.”

Prosecutor Joe Bird told Westminster Magistrates’ Court earlier this week: “They are all linked together – different firms, different costs but there’s a common thread between them.

“The claims were for work not done or grossly inflated. They suggested the work had taken far longer than it did. It all came to light after the claims were queried.”

Ms Maciel and Mr Ghaffar, both of South Woodford, Mr Shah, of Windsor, Berkshire, and Mr Ameyaw-Kyeremeh, of Croydon, all deny one count of conspiracy to commit an offence of fraud by false representation.

Gazi Khan, of Isleworth, west London, Rashid, of Langley, Berkshire, denies three counts of the same charge.

Azhar Khan, of Pinner, Middlesex, denies one count of fraud by false representation and one count of conspiracy to commit an offence of fraud by false representation.

Mr Moody, of Surbiton, Surrey, denies two counts of fraud by false representation.

Ms Bashir, of Slough, faces one count of fraud by false representation and appeared in court separately.

All were bailed and will appear at Southwark Crown Court for a plea and trial preparation hearing on 14 August.




Blog


Judging proportionate risk requires confidence. Do law firms have it?

As of 30 June 2026, the money laundering regulations have been updated again, this time to make the regime more proportionate and addressing unnecessary over-compliance.


Is clients’ use of AI destroying legal privilege?

Much has been written about the risks of lawyers misusing AI. However, in my view, the greater challenge lies elsewhere: the routine use of AI by clients themselves.


Does the Lloyd review mark the end of the Legal Services Act?

The Legal Services Board often generates eye-rolls and irritation from the leaders of the frontline regulators it oversees and of the representative bodies attached to them.


Loading animation