Legal Futures Roundtable Report in association with Search Acumen: Exploiting data
The working practices of property lawyers have changed little since the 19th century. Many aspects of the conveyancing process remain offline – documents are still on paper and the data entered manually. The commercial transaction process is laborious, slow and expensive, and both the client and firm are losing out as a result, a maddening thought in today’s world of digitisation, artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain.
We held a roundtable with Search Acumen to discuss what data means for commercial conveyancing. A discussion that started with the growing sophistication of property searches ended up at a vision of the commercial law firm of the future, shaped and staffed very differently from now. Those who are scared of ideas like blockchain should look away now.
In our discussion, Law Society vice-president Christina Blacklaws also emphasised the risk of solicitors not grasping this opportunity – that others will come along to dictate the future, leaving lawyers on the sidelines and part of a vision somebody else is creating. There have been many examples of lawyers not taking the initiative and suffering as a result; maybe here, with a process to which lawyers are so central, there is a chance to reverse this trend.
Legal Futures Roundtable Report in association with the CLC: Regulating the robots
The march of the digital conveyancer continues apace, from the government planning to create the largest repository of open land data in the world, to the rapid adoption of sophisticated technology by conveyancers, such as chatbots and artificial intelligence.
So, how does legal regulation keep up with this? In association with the Council for Licensed Conveyancers, we convened a roundtable of industry experts to consider the current state of the market, the changes that technology could bring, and how the regulator should adapt.
It was clear from the discussion that the greatest challenge will be to devise a regulatory framework sufficiently flexible that it does not require constant tinkering as the technology continues to develop – regulation has always had the problem of constantly trying to catch up with the market. It has to balance protecting consumers with encouraging innovation for the benefit of those consumers. This is no easy task.
Legal Futures Roundtable Report, in association with Thomson Reuters: Profit Motive
This Legal Futures roundtable report, published in association with Thomson Reuters, looks at what SME law firms are doing to grow their profit margins at a time of economic uncertainty and ever-greater competition.
What was so striking about the debate was that despite the very different practices represented around the table, the approach was largely the same. From bespoke property law advice from a traditional partnership to largely automated personal injury work from a limited company, there was more that united our participants than divided them – although the continuing role of the partnership was one of them.
Putting a few lawyers around a table invariably produces a stimulating and challenging discussion, and this was no different. There will always be a place for SME law firms, and this roundtable – showcasing their ability to focus, experiment, and succeed – shows how valuable they are to the legal ecosystem.
Legal Futures Roundtable Report, in association with LexisNexis: The Value Proposition
This Legal Futures roundtable report, published in association with LexisNexis, looks at what we call ‘the value proposition’ – how innovative firms have set upon a distinctive path and are ploughing them with vigour and success.
We gathered representatives of various firms around the table who show that it is not all about alternative business structures and radical ways of delivering legal services – it can also be about more subtle changes to form and focus that set firms out from the pack.
There is, of course, much to treasure in the traditions of the legal profession that have grown up over so many years, but there is equally no reason to preserve them in aspic.
We also tackled what LexisNexis’s Bellwether report earlier this year called ‘The riddle of perception’ – which showed that many lawyers do not know their clients quite as well as they think they do. The firms around the table showed that, however, some do.
Insight: The impact of technology
The fourth issue of Legal Futures Insight takes on arguably the biggest issue in the market today: what technology means for legal practice.
The purpose is not to look at what has become commonplace technology, but instead to look to the future, such as to artificial intelligence. We investigate how advanced data processing and contract analysis have delivered some spectacular results already, while virtual assistants could lead to a new breed of ‘knowledge worker’, who will not be a lawyer or accountant. Is AI the end of the lawyer, or actually liberation from more routine work?
Then there is online dispute resolution, which looks likely to be introduced in a new HM Online Court. It may mean many local courts may no longer be needed, but is this credible given that court technology is currently in the Stone Age?
And what does technology mean for client interaction? Where should the tech end and direct dealing with clients begin?
Finally, one man with always his eye on the future is Professor Richard Susskind, and we evaluate the radical predictions he and his son make about the advance of technology in their new book, The Future of the Professions.
Insight: Personal Injury
The third issue of Legal Futures Insight delves into an area of legal practice that has been in constant turmoil over recent years: personal injury.
MedCo has been the source of constant headlines on our sister site Litigation Futures in recent months, and in this issue we explore what is going well and what not so well. With the process of weeding out some of the worst offenders now underway, is fragmentation of the market for medical reports is a good thing or will it only lead to more confusion?
The other most pressing issue of the moment is clinical negligence. Once seen as a safe haven from mainstream personal injury, it is facing a double-pronged assault: caps on fees in low-value cases (although what the government considers low value is very different from claimant lawyers), and an end to the recoverability of after-the-event (ATE) premiums for experts’ reports. We look at both issues and the state of the ATE market more broadly.
Finally, with the suspension of budgeting for negligence claims in the High Court from next month, three leading costs lawyers give their very frank views on what the problems are and what the way forward might be.
The second issue of Legal Futures Insight explores some of the big changes shaping the future of conveyancing.
With award-winning marketing, massive investment and a later than expected launch, Veyo has finally arrived. Leading conveyancers, including the head of a top five firm, the new president of the Law Society and licensed conveyancers myhomemove give their very different reactions.
Lender Exchange has been with us for longer, but it is only this year that it has signed up virtually every active conveyancing firm – almost 5,000. Insight 2 finds out whether Lender Exchange, and its smaller rival LMS, will make life simpler, easier and quicker for conveyancers or add to their burdens.
Meanwhile we investigate how the Land Registry is trying to drag the world of local land charges into the 21st Century by digitising data traditionally kept by local authorities. Search providers are divided on the issue, with one predicting that “the likelihood of it going smoothly is almost zero”.
Meanwhile the property market has been extremely healthy, particularly after the general election. Sheila Kumar, chief executive of the Council for Licensed Conveyancers and Victoria Hurdley from the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives discuss their plans to tackle increasing demand for qualified staff, while responding to the changing market.
Insight: Regulation & Compliance
The first in our quarterly Insight series looks at the regulation of legal services and how it is changing.
It explores different reactions to four fundamental changes the profession is having to grapple with this year – the end of hours-based professional development, the arrival of a real choice of regulator, changes to the Separate Business Rule and the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s plans to slim down the Accounts Rules and the Code of Conduct.
It finds that there is currently no consensus on the best way forward on any of these issues. Some believe solicitors, particularly in small firms, are burdened by too many rules, while other believe a lack of rules will only create huge amounts of guidance. Likewise, the Separate Business Rule has powerful advocates and equally determined opponents.
Even on ‘continuing competence’, there is no agreement on whether an hours-based approach is a good or bad thing. Meanwhile, as the number of legal regulators doubles to four, the heads of the Solicitors Regulation Authority, CILEx Regulation, the Bar Standards Board and Council for Licensed Conveyancers set out their stalls, giving us some idea where future battle lines will be drawn.
This Legal Futures Special Report, published in association with Thomson Reuters, looks at how SME law firms are driving change in the delivery of legal services. It finds that to some extent innovation is a state of mind, and structure is secondary to how your run your business, but the availability of alternative business structure (ABS) status and the actual or threatened entry of new competition has focused minds, and in some cases becoming an ABS has proved of direct value.
The report also highlights the central role technology is having, with firms using it either to improve what is already in place today or to enable the delivery of services in new ways. But while there was an acceptance that lawyers have only scratched the surface of what technology has to offer, law remains as much art as science – technology only takes us so far. Where the trends of technology and business structures are pushing us is to focus brains on the real legal work, not the process that can just as efficiently be handled by less-qualified staff or advanced systems.
The report concludes: “The innovators recognise these shifts – for those who do not, a rude awakening may not be far away.”
Innovation in the City
This first Legal Futures Special Report, in association with Thomson Reuters, examines the changing face of City law firms. It demonstrates how far City law firms have moved in a relatively short period of time, mainly (but not exclusively) in response to the recession and the demands of their clients.
Many are coming up with a range of tactical and strategic responses to the challenges they face, while a smaller number are rethinking the way they do business, and the value and service they provide to clients. Through interviews with leading figures in the City, and a roundtable debate between representatives of the new entrants to the market and traditional big firms, this Special Report shows how innovation is as much part of the City’s story as it is the rest of the profession’s in the ABS era.