Clegg: legal profession is not doing enough on social mobility

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

20 December 2011

Clegg: it cannot be right that justice for the many is overseen by the representatives of the few

The legal profession “is not doing enough” to make itself more representative of society, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg claimed yesterday.

In a high-profile speech to Demos and the Open Society Foundation, Mr Clegg said “intergenerational social mobility is the principal objective of the Coalition’s social policy”, but that government cannot do this alone.

“Some of our key professions still need to do a much better job of opening their doors. To take one example, the legal profession remains woefully unrepresentative,” he said.

“More than two-thirds of all High Court judges and top barristers are privately-educated. Nine out ten QCs are men. Nineteen out of 20 are white.

“I know that us politicians have to get our house in order too. Not least my own party, which is too male and too pale. We are working hard to fix that. But my message to the legal profession, and especially to the bar, is: you are not doing enough either. It cannot be right that justice for the many is overseen by the representatives of the few.”

Mr Clegg said that both the law and politics must, above all, represent the nation as a whole. “But t

he nation is not represented in them. We’ve had years of warm words and incremental progress. It’s time for a step change.”

Bar Council chairman Peter Lodder QC responded: “The Deputy Prime Minister’s comments entirely ignore the Bar’s efforts to improve the diversity of the profession in recent decades. As a result, almost half of those called to the Bar in the last year are female and the percentage of individuals from a black and minority ethnic (BME) background is representative of the general population.

“Unfortunately, this impressive progress is being seriously undermined by the government’s proposed cuts to fees for publicly funded barristers, with women and BME practitioners disproportionately affected in these practice areas, and its decision to increase drastically the cost of higher education.

“Contrary to Nick Clegg’s suggestion, the Bar is doing more than its fair share to widen entry to the profession. The government must do its bit to ensure that the Bar remains open to all.”

This is the second time in recent weeks that Mr Clegg has focused on problems with social mobility in the legal profession. In the previous speech to the Financial Services Lawyers Association, Mr Clegg lauded the legal executive qualification as “the only route to becoming a qualified lawyer that is open to all, regardless of education, social status or background”.

He said: “So if you are serious about social mobility, it seems to be that a huge part of the solution lies right on your doorstep – or at least back in your offices.”


2 Responses to “Clegg: legal profession is not doing enough on social mobility”

  1. The Citizenship Foundation has worked on developing young people’s knowledge and understanding of the law for over twenty years, with considerable input from the legal profession.

    We have a tremendous amount of support from both individuals and organisations. They are committed to raising not only young people’s awareness of the law but also their aspirations towards a career in law.

    Every year we engage nearly 10,000 young people in the law and legal system. They are from non-fee-paying schools, often from inner-city areas of high deprivation and from a diverse range of backgrounds.

    These programmes are supported annually by a huge network of legal volunteers including over 500 solicitors, 300 barrister and advocate volunteers, 800 magistrates and 80 judges.

    The work is supported generously by many bodies within the sector, including The Law Society, The Bar Council, The Magistrates’ Association, The Faculty of Advocates, The Bar Library of Northern Ireland, Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service and over 30 law firms and in-house legal teams.

    While diversity within the profession is a significant issue, it is important to recognise just how much the profession is already doing to improve the situation.

  2. David Raeburn on December 21st, 2011 at 11:23 am
  3. I would agree that many in the profession are working hard to achieve this. My concern is with the introduction of higher fees how can we expect to see a diverse range of students feeding into the profession going forwards?

  4. Julie Carlisle on January 4th, 2012 at 2:24 pm

Legal Futures Blog

The digital deed: what will the digital mortgage mean for property transactions?

Andrew Lloyd 2017

Over the past 20 years, nearly all aspects of our financial lives have migrated online, from tax returns to banking. Yet arguably the most important and protracted financial process in our lives has remained doggedly devoted to the paper based world. A single signature in Rotherhithe, south-east London, on 4 April, however, may have just lit the touch paper for transforming this process. By signing the UK’s first ever digital mortgage through the government’s new “sign your mortgage deed” service, a signal was sent that the home-buying process is finally on course to be digitised, simplified and streamlined.

May 24th, 2018