Tag Results
QASA warning over “that’s not how I would have done it” evaluations by judges
Thursday, 11 February 2016Many judges are not “advocacy trainers” and may produce “subjective” evaluations under the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates scheme, solicitor-advocates have warned. The Solicitors’ Association of Higher Court Advocates said there was a danger that some judges would assess on the basis of how they would have done it.
Tags: advocacy, QASA, SAHCA
Posted in Barristers, Latest news, Legal Executives, Regulation, Solicitors
Blog
25 June 2021
Has the UK crowdfunding marketplace reached a crossroads?
Crowdfunding can be an attractive prospect for investors looking for high returns but a recent case has highlighted the risks involved and the apparent lack of due diligence.
22 June 2021
Virtual appraisals: Finding the opportunity in the challenge
Having an appraisal in the online arena presents an unsettling prospect – not just for the appraisee but also for the appraiser.
Reports
Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO.
Associates
