SRA “forced” to require firms to tell existing clients about new rights to complain

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

10 September 2010


Plant: board had no choice but to approve rule change

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has been forced “under duress” to approve a rule change under which solicitors will have to inform existing clients of their right to complain to the Legal Ombudsman, despite efforts to persuade the Legal Services Board (LSB) to change its position.

The Solicitors Code of Conduct 2007 was amended at the behest of the LSB in advance of the ombudsman starting work next month. The board had no choice but to approve the rule change because of the proximity of the ombudsman’s start date, SRA chairman Charles Plant told an SRA board meeting in London.

The LSB announced its requirements on so-called “signposting” in May (see story). Controversy at the meeting surrounded the meaning of the obligation to tell existing clients of the new complaints-handling procedure in writing “at the next appropriate opportunity”. Several board members complained that it would be onerous and in the case of “sophisticated clients”, wholly unnecessary.

The SRA was making the change “under duress”, said Samantha Barrass, director of its corporate regulation project, after the LSB had “not been receptive to any representations” on the matter.

SRA chief executive Antony Townsend defended the use of the word “appropriate” in the context of outcomes-focused regulation, which placed greater responsibility for decision-making on solicitors. He cautioned that if the matter was referred back to the LSB, solicitors could end up with something “highly restrictive which many firms would find onerous and inappropriate for their clients”.

Mr Plant said the points raised at the meeting needed to be addressed. Mr Townsend said he would draft a covering letter to solicitors giving guidance on appropriateness and proportionality in complying with the new obligation.

Tags: , , , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How do you choose your ATE provider?

Tony Dyas Allianz

Choosing an after-the-event (ATE) insurance provider isn’t easy for solicitors. Differentiation between products and price is not always clear at first glance and you don’t really know what you’re getting until you use it years later. And, as with all intangible insurance products, you can’t take it back. Many solicitors are very loyal to their ATE providers and often focus on price, but this isn’t the only consideration. So, as a law firm, what should you be thinking about when considering who to work with?

November 23rd, 2017