“Despondent” Bar could become enclave of the better-off once more, warns Lodder

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

31 August 2011


Lodder: Clarke needs to reaffirm support for the independent Bar

Criminal law barristers have reached a new low of despondency, the chairman of the Bar Council has told Lord Chancellor Ken Clarke.

Peter Lodder QC warned that the government’s legal aid cuts could also see the Bar return to “a professional enclave for the better-off” as students are discouraged by mounting debts.

In a recent letter, he said the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill – which returns to its House of Commons committee stage next week – posed “perhaps the biggest challenge” to the existence of the criminal Bar.

“Experienced and talented individuals are leaking away from the profession. Pupillage opportunities in publicly-funded work are simply drying up in several large metropolitan cities. The recruitment crisis is having immediate effects which, unless checked, could well have longer-term damaging consequences (no doubt unforeseen and unintended).”

Mr Lodder said: “In 30 years of practice at the criminal Bar, I have never known its practitioners to be more despondent. It would do much to remove the criminal Bar’s current sense of anger and lift them from their despondency if you could make clear your commitment to the survival of the independent Bar.” The pair have a meeting scheduled for next week.

He said this, combined with students’ debts often of £50-60,000 and the “inherent uncertainty of practice as a self-employed barrister”, may well discourage “all but the most wealthy, who are not always the most talented” from joining the Bar.

“There is a real risk that the Bar will return to becoming a professional enclave for the better off and put paid to the government’s efforts to promote greater social mobility in the professions, efforts which the Bar has strongly supported,” he said.

Mr Lodder argued that this would have wider implications for the effective administration of justice by reducing the pool of skilled prosecutors and defenders, as well as judges. It could also impact London’s position as a leading global centre of international dispute resolution.

He concluded by asking the government to “think again about the total costs of the changes it is making and recognise the value of the work of the Bar”.

Tags: , , , , , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Three reasons why you should be more vigilant about the emails you send in 2018

Ben Mitchell DocsCorp

In December 2017, the Information Commissioner’s Office (reported that data security incidents between April and June 2017 had increased by 15% compared to the previous year. This is nothing new – data breaches have been on the rise for years. Yet law firms are often more concerned about protecting sensitive information from external threats than from a far more likely cause: human error. Human error was behind the forwarding of confidential plans from The Bank of England to The Guardian. The sender included the wrong recipient in the email and, ever since, autocomplete has been disabled and staff at the UK’s main financial regulator must now enter every single address manually.

January 17th, 2018