Litigation/Dispute Resolution


BT collective action ruling “could open the floodgates”

4 October 2021

The Competition Appeal Tribunal’s approval of a second opt-out collective action is likely to open the floodgates to more applications, it has been claimed.


‘Negligent’ London firm defeats £12m claim for lack of causation

1 October 2021

Leading London law firm Withers has fought off a £12m claim on the basis of causation after the High Court ruled that it gave negligent advice to a property developer.


Solicitor’s error delayed case by a year

1 October 2021

A party whose solicitor overlooked for a year the need to seek a consent order from the court to stay a commercial dispute has been granted relief from sanctions.


High Court holds clients in contempt for failing to pay solicitors £2.3m

30 September 2021

Two clients who owe their solicitors £2.3m in outstanding fees, costs and interest have been found guilty of 14 charges of contempt of court.


Giving evidence “not a game”, judge tells expert witness

28 September 2021

An expert witness has apologised to the High Court after being told by a judge not to treat giving evidence in court “as a game”.


Gateley launches £50m litigation fund as LCM reports “robust” results

24 September 2021

Listed law firm Gateley has signed a deal with a US-based litigation funder for a £50m facility to back disputes, while funder LCM has announced “robust” results after a tricky year.


Barrister waived privilege in document by showing it to opposing counsel

22 September 2021

Counsel for a defendant in possession proceedings voluntarily disclosed a draft witness statement to her opposing number and in doing so waived privilege, the High Court has ruled.


Susskind: Remote hearings have “opened door slightly” to courts revolution

20 September 2021

A year of video hearings does not constitute “a lasting revolution in court service” but it has shown the potential for improving the justice system, Professor Richard Susskind has argued.


Slater & Gordon fails in “full frontal” court attack on Checkmylegalfees

17 September 2021

Slater & Gordon has failed in what a costs judge called a “full frontal attack” on the business model of the law firm bringing hundreds of claims over deductions made from the damages of former clients.


Profits soar as listed legal business benefits from litigation investment

15 September 2021

RBG Holdings, the AIM-listed company that now owns two law firms, saw profits increase nearly three-fold in the first six months of the year, fuelled by gains from its litigation work.


Law firm invests own capital in £150m deal with litigation funder

9 September 2021

Leading London law firm Mishcon de Reya is investing capital and some of the fees it receives in future from cases into a litigation funding partnership.


Law Society and APIL lead opposition to fixed costs extension

8 September 2021

Government plans to widen the use of fixed recoverable costs in civil cases would blow a hole in access to justice, the Law Society has said in urging the government to rethink.


Litigation funder launches “automated secondary market”

8 September 2021

A litigation funding platform has launched an “automated secondary market” to allow high-net-worth individuals to trade investments in cases that already have funding.


Ministry of Justice to press ahead with fixed costs expansion

7 September 2021

The Ministry of Justice has confirmed that it will implement Sir Rupert Jackson’s blueprint for fixed recoverable costs across the fast-track and in most money cases worth up to £100,000.


High Court dismisses £2.7m law firm negligence claim

7 September 2021

The High Court has granted summary judgment in favour of a law firm and its senior partner and dismissed a £2.7m negligence claim.

← Page 66 Page 67 of 72 Page 68 →

Blog


Judging proportionate risk requires confidence. Do law firms have it?

As of 30 June 2026, the money laundering regulations have been updated again, this time to make the regime more proportionate and addressing unnecessary over-compliance.


Is clients’ use of AI destroying legal privilege?

Much has been written about the risks of lawyers misusing AI. However, in my view, the greater challenge lies elsewhere: the routine use of AI by clients themselves.


Does the Lloyd review mark the end of the Legal Services Act?

The Legal Services Board often generates eye-rolls and irritation from the leaders of the frontline regulators it oversees and of the representative bodies attached to them.