Litigation/Dispute Resolution


FCA and solicitors in war of words over motor finance challenge

24 April 2026

The FCA has told solicitors and CMCs challenging its motor finance redress scheme that they should give their clients the chance to end their retainers.


“Aggressive” circuit judge interrupted barrister excessively

24 April 2026

A circuit judge who adopted an aggressive tone with a female barrister and interrupted her excessively has been issued with “formal advice” for misconduct.


Exclusive: CA clarifies Mazur ruling after Law Society application

23 April 2026

The Court of Appeal has made amendments to its Mazur ruling to make clear that law firms are not at risk of committing a criminal offence through inadequate supervision of unauthorised persons.


Motor finance law firm to launch JR of lifetime smoking ban

23 April 2026

A law firm which specialises in motor finance claims is to launch and fund a judicial review of new legislation which will ban anyone born after 1 January 2009 from buying tobacco.


The drama is over – no Mazur appeal

22 April 2026

The Law Society has decided against trying to appeal last month’s Court of Appeal ruling in Mazur, it has confirmed to Legal Futures.


Judge warns PI firms of SRA referrals over damages deductions

21 April 2026

Personal injury solicitors who jack up their base costs to ensure they always hit the 25% cap on deductions from damages risk referral to the SRA, a senior district judge has warned.


Government eyes consumer class actions regime

21 April 2026

The Law Commission has launched a new project to consider whether a consumer class action regime should be introduced.


Solicitor builds AI adversary designed to dismantle legal arguments

20 April 2026

A solicitor who knows how to code has created an AI adversary that stress-tests legal arguments before they are tried in court.


Collective action “more for benefit of lawyers and funders”

17 April 2026

Judges have refused to grant a collective proceedings order over an alleged salmon production cartel because it appears more for the benefit of lawyers and funders than consumers.


High Court broadens scope of legal advice privilege

17 April 2026

The High Court has widened legal advice privilege to all internal documents created by the client where the dominant purpose is to seek legal advice, even if they would not actually be sent to a lawyer.


Prison sentence for former executor who refused law firm’s requests

15 April 2026

The High Court has imposed a suspended prison sentence on a former executor who failed to comply with court orders by not providing information to a law firm.


Declarations on AI in witness statements “would reduce efficiency”

15 April 2026

Making litigators declare that they did not use AI in preparing witness statements would “reduce the efficiency that AI has introduced in certain tasks”, says APIL.


Law Society trains focus on SRA for Mazur supervision guidance

14 April 2026

The Law Society has put the focus on the SRA to give the profession guidance on what amounts to supervision following the Mazur ruling.


Top City firm ordered to pay wasted costs over instruction error

13 April 2026

A leading City law firm has been ordered to pay wasted costs in a maritime matter because it wrongly told the defendants that it was instructed by the claimant’s insurer.


Claimants can have two law firms for £85m Vodafone claim

10 April 2026

A High Court judge has agreed to let 62 former Vodafone franchisees be represented by two law firms in their £85m claim against the mobile phone company.

← Page 4 Page 5 of 72 Page 6 →

Blog


Judging proportionate risk requires confidence. Do law firms have it?

As of 30 June 2026, the money laundering regulations have been updated again, this time to make the regime more proportionate and addressing unnecessary over-compliance.


Is clients’ use of AI destroying legal privilege?

Much has been written about the risks of lawyers misusing AI. However, in my view, the greater challenge lies elsewhere: the routine use of AI by clients themselves.


Does the Lloyd review mark the end of the Legal Services Act?

The Legal Services Board often generates eye-rolls and irritation from the leaders of the frontline regulators it oversees and of the representative bodies attached to them.