The lawyer will see you now: is “GP Law” the future for the high street?

High street: lawyes should make local connections

The future for high street lawyers is to evolve into a relationship manager who can direct clients to find the right advice from a range of legal and non-legal sources, the managing director of LexisNexis in the UK has said.

Dubbing this “GP Law”, Josh Bottomley said it would mirror the modern role of GPs, “who diagnose what ails the patient, treats the problem if possible, sends them to a specialist if necessary or provides a drug that has had huge sums invested to develop it.”

High street lawyers have the opportunity to become the “trusted adviser” who sends the client to a specialist service provider or guides them in the use of a “self-service” offering, he said.

He explained: “Whilst ‘self-serving’ may appear a way to reduce cost for the customer,as most people have experienced when attempting to self-serve in a supermarket, you sometimes need a specialist to come and help you. This approach would reduce cost to some extent but still retain the knowledge of a lawyer and reassurance for the client.”

Mr Bottomley pointed to research conducted for LexisNexis last year which found that 60% of the public wanted a lawyer with specialised knowledge, as well as someone who was approachable and able to explain the issues involved.

Though high street lawyers have a broad legal knowledge that allows them to deal with clients’ most common legal needs, like a GP the lawyer is also a specialist on the legal market, knowing who to direct their clients to, Mr Bottomley explained.

He continued: “In addition to referring to another lawyer, the connection may well be to a professional from a different field, such as an accountant, an offshore or virtual service or, at times, the lawyer may suggest the client self-serves, with the lawyer helping them through the process.

“This final part of the jigsaw could put the small law firm at the centre of all the changes that are taking place in the legal services market. It positions the lawyer as the invaluable source of information about how to extract value from an increasing number of options open to SMEs and consumers – as long as the lawyer is someone who is known and trusted in the community.

“Over time, it may lead to the lawyer being the professional who channels fees to the innovative service providers: a de facto budget holder for the client.”

Mr Bottomley said small firms should also collaborate with other lawyers, introduce fixed fees and involve themselves in their communities – “real and virtual” – to build profile.

The future of high street firms was debated at a roundtable hosted this morning by LexisNexis and attended by Legal Futures. There was broad agreement that the traditional sole practitioner will struggle to survive in the emerging legal market, although small firms can thrive with innovative thinking.

One solicitor from a small London practice explained how he cannot afford to employ full-time employment lawyers, but has arrangements with two employment specialists to call on their services when required; they are networked into the firm and covered by its indemnity insurance. The roundtable was conducted on a Chatham House basis, meaning we cannot identify the individuals taking part.

The solicitor said he saw his firm as a business providing legal services, and that its purpose was to take clients from A to B, rather than to provide legal advice. This meant better understanding what the client wanted – for example, he visits elderly clients in their homes, dressed less formally than in the office, to draw up wills for them. Clients will pay a premium for this kind of quality professional service, he said.

Consumers buying legal services on price mean a different dynamic. A law firm consultant said a problem for many firms is that they are set up to provide partner-led services to clients interested in lower cost.

Another solicitor highlighted the dangers of price comparison websites. While they may be good for driving referrals to firms, they are “terrible for client loyalty”, he argued, because the next time the consumer needs legal advice, they are likely to return to the website first rather than the law firm.


    Readers Comments

  • Brian Rogers says:

    Shouldn’t ‘GP Law’ read ‘CLA Law’ on the basis that it has been intimated that the CLA will refer legal aid enquirers who are not eligible to law firms?

    Why go elsewhere when there may be a slim chance that you might get legal aid, but if you don’t you will get referred to a law firm recommended by a public body?

  • This is one of the ways that the legal market may develop following the introduction of Alternative Business Structures (ABSs) in October this year.

    Certainly the high street practitioner as “jack of all trades” will struggle to survive without a new role. Solicitors will either have to specialise in particular areas of law or may be able to develop a niche, as suggested here, as trusted advisor. The public’s growing use of the internet may make this more difficult.

    ABSs will also see the entry of the ‘category killers’ into areas of law often the reserve of high street practitioners, such as conveyancing, family law and wills and probate. The risk is that businesses with good brand names and experience of dealing with consumers, such as Marks & Spencer, enter into the market and develop economies of scale in dealing with these services that the public perceive as commodities. One thing is for certain, doing nothing is not an option.

    Mark Briegal

  • Mr Bottomley has hit the nail on the head in identifying the trusted adviser role a being the key for professional service providers post-LSA. Clients are not interested in the silos within which the professions have operated in the past. It is surprising, though, that the MD of Lexis Nexis should have omitted to identify the sine qua non of this role, namely comprehensive client factfinding processes and the establishment of firm-wide client databases. In this and many other respects (not least Outcomes Focused Regulation) solicitors have much to learn from fee-based financial advisers, whose services are an indispensable part of the armoury of the trusted adviser.

  • It appear that solicitors firms really do need to wake up and either join forces to offer holistic approaches to legal services or simply market themselves much better.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Loading animation