Claims management companies see income soar to £581m

Text pests: new regulator group aims to curb practice

The turnover of claims management companies (CMC) soared by 57% to £581m over the past year, despite a ten-fold increase in the number of businesses having their authorisation cancelled, their regulator has reported.

In his annual report for the year to 31 March, Kevin Rousell also revealed that his staff direct unrepresented consumers away from those he regulates, along with a crackdown on unsolicited texting.

After two years where turnover was fairly static at around £370m, the report says the sharp increase in the last 12 months was due to CMCs operating in personal injury (£248m to £377m) and the financial services and products sector (£104m to £189m).

Between them the four other areas of regulated CMC activity – criminal injuries, industrial injuries disablement, housing disrepair and employment – accounted for just £15.6m, most of which was from employment work.

At the end of March 2011, there were 3,213 authorised CMCs, up just 91 on the year before, although this masks several hundred firms opening and closing during the year. The claims management regulator cancelled the authorisation of 349 businesses, compared to just 35 the year before.

The report said: “The majority of those cancelled were for non-payment of fees, but a significant number were cancelled for rule breaches that were not remedied.” These included not dealing with clients fairly, poor sales practices and not providing consumers with pre-contract information.

The regulator assisted around 17,500 consumers with complaints or enquiries and Mr Rousell said his team will give general consumer advice where feasible. “For example, in the financial claims sector, we will signpost unrepresented consumers to independent non-commercial advice available from the Financial Ombudsman Service helpline about the financial complaint they have. It is important for consumers to be aware that in many cases, like payment protection insurance claims, there is an alternative to using a paid representative.”

However, he added that “good CMCs can provide a helpful service for some consumers by alerting them to circumstances where there may be a justified complaint and supporting them to obtain fair compensation”.

The report said the main challenges in dealing with unsolicited texts for claims services are identifying who is responsible for them and building up the evidence needed to take effective enforcement action.

The regulator has worked with the Direct Marketing Association to form a cross-industry regulator working group to address the problem, including Ofcom, the Information Commissioner, the Telephone Preference Service and representatives from the mobile marketing industry.


    Readers Comments

  • Roland Waters says:

    Just a shame the FOS takes much longer than the courts in so many matters and remains the protector of insurers business with no interests it would seem in resolving long term non-compliance with their old line we are not the regulator which seems to translate into we dont care – after all if the FOS themselves agreed as they used to to accept complaints from the tens of thousands of consumers who have been cold-called and misled out of full and fair compensation by motor insurers third party claims capping practices (all it seems in breach of FSA regs) perhaps the market would behave better – but then again the FOS has other ideas the FSMA where it allows third parties to complain to the FOS?

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Loading animation