You’re all through – good news for 1,000 lawyers who should have been eliminated from recorder competition


The bench is a step closer for recorder candidates

A thousand solicitors and barristers who would have been eliminated from the recorder appointment competition but for a meltdown of the Judicial Appointments Commission’s (JAC) website on Wednesday have instead got through to the next round.

In light of the website crashing, the JAC has announced that all candidates – nearly 2,500 – will take the second-round test.

The original intention had been that only the 60% of candidates with the highest marks would go on to the stage two test.

In a statement issued yesterday, the JAC said its chief executive had emailed all recorder candidates to apologise for the technical difficulties they experienced in taking the online qualifying test, and the distress and inconvenience this caused.

“In light of these problems, we have decided to invite all candidates to proceed to the second stage (written scenario test) of this multi-stage selection process. The test will take place during the week beginning 6 March and we will contact candidates to confirm exact arrangements.”

It may well have taken this step because some candidates did see at least some of the questions before the website went down.

The JAC has not provided any explanation as to why the weight of traffic caused the website to crash shortly after the six-hour window for taking the test opened – given that it knew how many candidates would be trying to access it – nor set out how it will ensure it does not happen again next time. Once more the plan is for candidates to have a six-hour window in which to take the test, which will last for 70 minutes.

The problems are a huge embarrassment to the JAC, especially in light of its vice-chairman, Lord Justice Burnett, declaring last month that “we are as confident as we can be” that IT problems that beset the previous recorder competition in 2015 had been ironed out.

However, by deciding not to repeat the stage one test, the JAC does at least stay within the timetable it has set to complete the whole four-stage process.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Retrospective or not retrospective, that is the question

As the debate heats up over the Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill, it is crucial to understand what is the true vice in retrospective legislation.


Harnessing the balance of technology and human interaction

In today’s legal landscape, finding the delicate balance between driving efficiency via use of technology and providing a personalised service is paramount to success.


AI’s legal leap: transforming law practice with intelligent tech

Just like in numerous other industries, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal sector is proving to be a game-changer.


Loading animation