Watchstone pays out £5.3m in legal fees after failed S&G claim


Slater & Gordon: £2.7m in costs paid to PwC

Watchstone – the company once known as Quindell – has paid out £5.3m in legal costs in large part due to its failed claim over Slater & Gordon’s acquisition of Quindell’s legal division in 2015.

In May 2023, Mr Justice Jacobs rejected its argument that accountancy firm PwC used confidential information to reduce the amount paid by Slater & Gordon by £63m.

Watchstone now exists solely as a vehicle to pursue legacy litigation matters and is listed on the Acquis Stock Exchange, which is primarily aimed at growth companies.

Its annual results for 2023, released this week, show that it made a loss after tax of £7.1m in 2023 as a result of the ruling in this case and settlement in Canada of a dispute between former Quindell subsidiary Hubio, an insurance tech business, and Aviva Canada.

Watchstone spent £2.6m on its own lawyers (up from £2.1m in 2022) and £2.7m in settling PwC’s legal fees.

Its solicitors for the PwC case were Dorsey & Whitney, instructing Tim Lord KC and Watson Pringle. PwC used Dentons, instructing Richard Handyside KC and Rebecca Loveridge.

In a joint statement, non-executive chairman Richard Rose and chief executive Stefan Borson – the only people still on the payroll following the PwC decision – said the High Court had refused Watchstone leave to appeal.

The Canada settlement, meanwhile, was “at a lower level than previously hoped”. But, they said, “given the litigation risk and the position of the group in respect of other matters, it was considered the best commercial outcome available”.

The outstanding case concerns the VAT treatment of certain supplies made by Ingenie Services, which was Quindell’s telematics business.

Both the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal found in favour of HM Revenue & Customs but Watchstone has been granted permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal. It has made provision for £71,000 in legal fees.

The company has been steadily returning its money to shareholders and currently holds net assets of £6.5m, representing around 14p per share.

The joint statement said: “We now look to conclude the final litigation asset and return the assets of the group to shareholders in due course. We would like to thank our shareholders for their support during 2023 and patience whilst we work to realise maximum value from our remaining assets.”

Slater & Gordon sued Watchstone in deceit and breach of warranty but it settled on the eve of trial in 2019 for just £11m, or less than 2% of the value of the claim.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


GEO – the impact of AI on digital marketing for law firms

GEO represents the biggest change in online business generation that I can remember. You cannot afford to stick with the same old engine optimisation techniques.


What the law can learn from fintech’s onboarding revolution

Client onboarding has always been slow. It’s not just about the paperwork and manual workflows; it’s also about those long AML checks and verifications.


Civil enforcement – progress at last with CJC report

‘When do I get my money?’ is a question that litigators acting for successful parties are used to fielding. The value of judgments is of course in the recovery made.


Loading animation