Watchdog clears legal app over using ‘shyster’ in TV advert

Advert: Woman angry at shoddy shysters

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has rejected a complaint about a TV advert for legal support app Legal Utopia using the word “shyster”.

The complainant, who understood the word to be a derogatory term used to describe Jewish people, challenged whether it was offensive.

The advert on Sky featured a voice-over that stated: “I’ve discovered Legal Utopia; the app to help you save time and potentially save money… It’s accessible, affordable law for all and for all sorts.”

The voice-over continued by giving examples of when the app could be used, including “claims against shoddy shysters”, accompanied by a shot of a women speaking angrily on the phone as she examined leaky pipes under a sink.

Legal Utopia’s agency had referred it at the pre-production stage to Clearcast, which vets adverts and had no concern about using the word.

Legal Utopia said the Oxford English Dictionary defined a shyster as a “dishonest or unscrupulous person”, adding that the etymology of the word was not clear and that most interpretations did not have an antisemitic basis.

It argued that the interpretation of the word coming from character of Shylock in the Shakespeare play The Merchant of Venice was “exceedingly remote and unsupported”, and so using it would or could not cause serious or widespread offence.

Clearcast told the ASA that it was very clear from the context that the word would be interpreted by the viewer as it was intended by the advertiser – to mean an unscrupulous or disreputable tradesperson.

In its decision, the ASA said the context of the scene “implied that the woman was berating a plumber who had carried out substandard work and that she could choose to seek legal recourse through consulting the app”.

It went on: “We understood that there were a range of opinions about the etymology of the word ‘shyster’, including that it referred to the character Shylock in The Merchant of Venice who was a Jewish moneylender.

“Others believed the word originated from the German word Scheißer. We understood that its common usage in British English was to describe an unscrupulous or disreputable person.”

The ASA said it sought the views of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, which had “no concerns about the use of the term in the ad”.

While some viewers may find the term distasteful, the regulator said, “we concluded that in the context of the ad it was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence”.

We reported last month that Legal Utopia was trying to crowdfund £200,000 for the next stage of its expansion. With the investment period about to end, it has smashed through its target, with 252 investors putting in nearly £215,000.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.

NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.

Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.

Loading animation