Vaginal mesh solicitor to face multiple charges at SDT


Surgical mesh: Solicitor faces multiple charges

A solicitor who acted for hundreds of women in vaginal mesh claims before his firm was shut down is to appear before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.

Darren Hanison faces multiple charges of dishonesty over his practice at Fortitude Law in Haywards Heath, Sussex.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) closed down the firm in May 2023 because there was “reason to suspect dishonesty” on the part of Mr Hanison, a recognised sole practitioner.

Campaign group Sling the Mesh said at the time that Mr Hanison was representing many of its members in their claims of harm as a result of vaginal mesh implant surgery and that the intervention left them “understandably angry and distraught”.

A notice published by the SRA yesterday said the tribunal has certified Mr Hanison has a case to answer in respect of allegations that included failing to take instructions from a client in relation to offers in litigation, and telling a client she was receiving a settlement but not that this was after taking nearly half of the offered amount in costs.

He is also accused of failed to deal with requests for payments from a third party, making misleading demands for costs, misleading another party as to the payment of costs and taking instructions on offers, and dishonestly keeping settlement money to pay supposed success fees.

Further allegations are that he failed to ensure clients had valid after-the-event (ATE) insurance policies in place, misleading clients into thinking they were not at risk of payment of costs if they lost the litigation, and misleading third parties and the SRA as to the existence of ATE insurance.

The SRA also says Mr Hanison submitted a false public indemnity insurance proposal and created fake insurance policy schedules.

The allegations are unproven pending the hearing.

Later in 2023, Fortitude had its costs slashed by Judge Jennifer James in the Senior Courts Costs Office.

She quoted the firm’s website as stating: “Fortitude Law has already helped, and is currently helping, many UK women to secure compensation of £100,000 or more in respect of negligent mesh implantation surgery – and our unique approach means that the individuals we act for receive compensation from the insurance which the private medical consultants, private hospitals and NHS trusts are required to have in place.”

The judge said: “It is not clear to me what ‘unique approach’ Fortitude Law is claiming, but as yet I have not seen a single claim that realised even half of £100,000 despite claims pitched well in excess of that sum and (in the case of HL) in excess of three quarters of a million pounds if one includes PSLA.” HL’s case settled for £30,000.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Is competition in the legal sector stifling innovation?

As the legal sector’s competitive landscape continues to evolve, Nobel laureates remind us that innovation is not inevitable,and that competition may not always be an incentive to innovate.


What high-performing consumer claims firms get right

Recurring concerns about parts of the volume claims sector show that the gap between well-run firms and those struggling to manage volume effectively is widening.


The SRA’s 2025 AML report: What law firms need to know

The SRA has released its 2024-25 anti-money laundering report and the scale of supervision is striking – it carried out 935 proactive engagements in the year to 5 April 2025.


Loading animation