Union joins forces with ABI and British Safety Council in PI fight


Lillis: Reforms unnecessary

Trade union Usdaw is building a broad coalition – including the Association of British Insurers (ABI) – in a bid to persuade the government to exclude workplace injuries from the small claims limit increase.

The British Safety Council and the Law Society have also thrown their support behind the campaign.

Though the Ministry of Justice is focused on the whiplash reforms – including raising the small claims limit from £1,000 to £5,000 – it is also planning to double the small claims limit for employers’ and public liability cases to £2,000.

At an event last week, Usdaw general secretary Paddy Lillis said its main objection was that this would “unnecessarily restrict access to justice for tens of thousands of injured workers. It will also have a negative impact on health and safety standards in workplaces”.

Injured people forced onto the small claims track would most likely end up litigants in person, which would place “unnecessary strain on the justice system”.

The government has excluded vulnerable road users from its whiplash reforms, and Usdaw argues that as “the employment relationship and the evidential complexity of cases mean that injured employees are also vulnerable claimants” and so should be excluded too.

Attracting the support of the ABI was undoubtedly a coup for the union. James Dalton, the ABI’s director of general insurance, said: “Workplace safety is an absolutely critical component of the world of work. What has never been the priority for us is employer liability and public liability cases, so we’re happy to support this campaign.”

Lawrence Waterman, chairman of the British Safety Council, added: “Our vision is no-one is injured or made ill through their work. When an employer gets it wrong it often results in a worker being harmed. Injured workers deserve to be compensated for their injuries, that’s why the British Safety Council is pleased to be a supporter of the Usdaw campaign.”

Richard Miller, head of justice at the Law Society, added that it was particularly concerned about how claimants could afford a medical report if forced into the small claims court: “You can’t bring a personal injury claim without a medical report, so there is a fundamental issue around access to the courts.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Planning for retirement
8 July 2020

In 2006 I started thinking about retirement whilst founding a boutique practice specialising in partnership and employment law. Ten years later, a friend told me that I would never be able to retire.


Time for a new regulatory settlement
3 July 2020

The problem with reform based on a compromise with vested interests is that it ends up being more pig’s ear than silk purse and the Legal Services Act 2007 is no exception.


Loading animation