‘Umbrella’ alternative business structures aims to build 1,000-lawyer network


Martyn Caplan

Caplan: “future for many law firms is getting more and more difficult”

Alternative business structure Lawyers Inc has said it aims to recruit between 800 and 1,000 lawyers over the next five years, having taken over two law firms as it rolls out its groundbreaking ‘umbrella’ model.

Lopian Wagner, a commercial firm based in Manchester city centre, and Alcock & Smalley, a conveyancing firm in Wigan, have joined Lawyers Inc, along with Peter Bayliss, a medical negligence specialist based in Somerset.

Director Martyn Caplan said he was talking to a dozen more firms.

Under the model operated by Lawyers Inc, partners become self-employed consultants in the ABS, while assistant solicitors are taken on as employees. This enables Lawyers Inc to recruit firms as well as individuals.

Mr Caplan, a former partner at Pannone, said: “We would like, once the practice really starts to grow, to have 800 to 1,000 lawyers by the end of the next five years. We’re looking for firms all over the country.

“The future for many law firms is getting more and more difficult, and they often lack direction. Bills are being paid, but there’s no succession planning and mergers don’t solve everything.

“We think our model is much more acceptable in many ways than a merger. There are no new partners or assistants to get used to, and you give your young lawyers a future.”

When firms are taken over by Lawyers Inc, equity partners become self-employed consultants and sign a fee-sharing agreement.

Mr Caplan said the general rule was that they retained 60% of their fees, rising to 80% if their fee income was high enough. Fee-earners become employees of Lawyers Inc, but their salaries are charged back to the partners.

Each former partner operates as a limited company, allowing salaries to be deducted from earnings, along with other expenses. Lawyers Inc takes charge of the lawyers’ secretarial, finance and administrative needs, which are outsourced.

The ABS also arranges indemnity insurance on behalf of its lawyers and provides compliance support. Firms retain their existing brands.

“From the client’s point of view, nothing changes. It’s the same lawyer and the same office, but with new notepaper and a new website,” Mr Caplan said. “If you’re part of an unhappy team in a law firm, which does not want to set up its own practice, then you can also become consultants with us.”

Mr Caplan said he thought Lawyers Inc would appeal not only to small firms, but to those with around 25 lawyers, which “can’t plan for the future and can’t find a merger partner”.

Mr Caplan said Lawyers Inc now employed 10 lawyers, with a turnover of around £1.5m, which he aimed to increase to over £5m in the next 12 months.

The other owners of the ABS are directors David Tucker, former chief executive of National Law Tutors, and Alexandra Markiewicz, a Belgian lawyer.

“The model is up and running, and we can see people are happy,” Mr Caplan added. “They’re earning good money and can see the potential for expansion. They can preserve their clients and the lawyers they’ve always worked with and keep a certain amount of independence and autonomy over what they’re doing.”

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Success planning trumps succession planning

Delivering messages that impact work colleagues is probably the hardest thing law firm leaders have to do, especially to older generation lawyers approaching the end of their careers.


Why remote working has exacerbated cyber-security concerns

The ‘rule of six’ has been in place since 14 September, with fines levied for those who break it and now we are seeing even more drastic restrictions reimposed. So what does this mean for the UK’s cyber-security?


Loading animation