Tory debate solicitor suspended for tweet “was being sarcastic”

Aman Thakar asking his question

A solicitor at the centre of a row after asking a question on Tuesday’s BBC debate between the prospective leaders of the Conservative Party has tried to defuse the situation following his suspension

Aman Thakar was suspended from his job as an employment lawyer at London law firm Leigh Day after it emerged he had sent what appeared to be a tweet condoning nationalism in the context of Adolf Hitler.

Mr Thakar had the final question on the programme, asking the candidates when they would call a general election, given that they would have no mandate from the people to be prime minister.

Yesterday, the focus was initially on the revelation by political gossip website Guido Fawkes that Mr Thakar had been a Labour Party council candidate last year in Southwark and also “worked in Labour HQ”, where he dealt with complaints about antisemitism. The website cited an unnamed source describing him as “uber partisan”.

It soon followed this up with a screen shot of a tweet Mr Thakar sent in February that said: “Hitler’s abuse of the term nationalism is, to me a nationalist, the most harmful part of his legacy.”

This triggered action from Leigh Day. A spokesman said: “We can confirm that Aman Thakar is currently a solicitor at Leigh Day in our employment department. We have been made aware of a tweet which we are taking very seriously.

“Mr Thakar has been suspended with immediate effect from the firm whilst we carry out an internal investigation into these matters.”

Mr Thakar has since issued a tweet in which he sought to provide context for his February message, adding: “My full and sincere apologies for any offence caused.”

He explained that he was responding to a tweet about American conservative commentator Candace Owens, who had attracted attention on social media that day with a video in which she said she did not have “any problems at all with the word ‘nationalism’”, a word she said was too often associated with Hitler when in fact Hitler’s ambitions were “not nationalism”.

Mr Thakar said his tweet was a “sarcastic” response and “not my point of view”.

The Campaign Against Antisemitism said earlier in the day that it was referring Mr Thakar to the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

In response to criticism about choosing a Labour supporter to ask a question, the BBC said: “[The] questioners held a range of political views and we did not specify these views nor their backgrounds although some chose to do so themselves.

“The last questioner on the debate is a solicitor who was seconded by his law firm to the Labour Party in the past, rather than being a Labour ‘staffer’. He is a Labour supporter and once stood as a councillor.”

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


How could instant messaging transform your law firm?

The vast majority of law firms have no instant messaging capability. In what other sector is that the case? Most stick to traditional communications channels. In 2021 there’s no good reason for that.

From cost saving to revenue making – post-pandemic commercial success

Commercial success is the driving force for ambitious law firms and it should come as no surprise that many have a renewed determination to re-evaluate their businesses in the wake of Covid-19.

Success in-house – what people don’t tell you about how to get there

TV dramas have made many people think that the legal profession consists of heroes (or villains) in high-flying firms or public prosecution. In reality, nearly a quarter of solicitors work in-house.

Loading animation