Three convicted for providing unregulated legal advice


Old Bailey: Sentencing adjourned

Owners of a business that falsely claimed it could supervise immigration law firms and made millions of pounds as a result, along with a director of one of those franchises, have been convicted at the Old Bailey.

Dan Romulus Dandes and Babbar Ali Jamil – the directors of DDR Legal Services LLP – and Zia Bi, director of Burlow & Spencer Ltd, were found guilty of six counts relating to 19 offences of providing unqualified immigration advice and/or services contrary to section 91 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. The charges dated from 1 February 2016 to 30 April 2018.

Immigration is the only area of law which is not one of the reserved legal activities but is subject to a standalone regulatory regime that allows non-lawyers to practise in it, overseen by the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC).

Romanian practitioner Mr Dandes – who claimed his qualification in the EU allowed him to operate DDR – used it as a consultancy and supervision business helping people set up immigration law ‘franchises’.

A number of individuals and organisations signed up to the scheme, which was designed to circumvent regulation by the OISC or any other regulatory body.

The DDR website says “our licensees do NOT need to be regulated by the OISC or the SRA as they are acting on our behalf”.

It claims to have 18 licensees, who have processed nearly 67,000 applications and turned over almost £27m.

Mr Dandes told the court he provided advice to immigrants in the UK because he believed it was “100% legal”.

Asked whether he realised his colleague’s membership of the Bar in Romania was not valid for providing immigration services in the UK, Mr Jamil said: “I had no idea.”

Burlow & Spencer was one of the companies claiming supervision by DDR, and its website says it employs “a team of highly qualified and extremely knowledgeable lawyers”.

But after receiving 95 complaints about the firm and a two-year investigation, the OISC challenged DDR’s claim to being qualified to provide supervision, meaning any immigration advice given was unregulated and therefore illegal.

The court was told that Burlow & Spencer staff encouraged clients to lie to the Home Office to secure their visa applications.

Burlow & Spencer has now ceased trading, with former clients being advised to contact Fortis Insolvency in respect of fees paid or the return of documents.

Judge Sarah Munro QC said the case would “inevitably result in financial penalties”, and adjourned sentencing until September, after consideration of a financial investigation and possible confiscation orders.

OISC deputy commissioner Dr Ian Leigh said: “In a devious and calculating way over a considerable period of time the scheme put in place by DDR Legal Service LLP, was successful in dishonestly taking a significant amount of money from vulnerable people.

“There was a total disregard for statutory requirements, and they acted in deliberate defiance of the law. The degree of culpability is high, as is the harm they have caused.

“They owe a considerable amount of money to individuals and by the high number of complaints against Burlow & Spencer alone, they have clearly undermined the immigration system.

“These are serious offences that are aggravated by a knowing and calculating disregard of the statutory regime; the sophistication of the offences is reflected by the time and effort put in by officers of the OISC to investigate and prosecute.”




    Readers Comments

  • jim holloway says:

    OISC allowed this outfit to continue operating when it was obviously a scam, which was flagged up to them by concerned advisors as well as customers whose lives have been trashed.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

13 November 2019

The October PII renewal: Why the market changed

Since the abolition of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund, the October professional indemnity insurance renewal season has always been a challenge, but this year most law firms saw their premiums go up.

Read More

Loading animation