Three convicted for providing unregulated legal advice

Old Bailey: Sentencing adjourned

Owners of a business that falsely claimed it could supervise immigration law firms and made millions of pounds as a result, along with a director of one of those franchises, have been convicted at the Old Bailey.

Dan Romulus Dandes and Babbar Ali Jamil – the directors of DDR Legal Services LLP – and Zia Bi, director of Burlow & Spencer Ltd, were found guilty of six counts relating to 19 offences of providing unqualified immigration advice and/or services contrary to section 91 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. The charges dated from 1 February 2016 to 30 April 2018.

Immigration is the only area of law which is not one of the reserved legal activities but is subject to a standalone regulatory regime that allows non-lawyers to practise in it, overseen by the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC).

Romanian practitioner Mr Dandes – who claimed his qualification in the EU allowed him to operate DDR – used it as a consultancy and supervision business helping people set up immigration law ‘franchises’.

A number of individuals and organisations signed up to the scheme, which was designed to circumvent regulation by the OISC or any other regulatory body.

The DDR website says “our licensees do NOT need to be regulated by the OISC or the SRA as they are acting on our behalf”.

It claims to have 18 licensees, who have processed nearly 67,000 applications and turned over almost £27m.

Mr Dandes told the court he provided advice to immigrants in the UK because he believed it was “100% legal”.

Asked whether he realised his colleague’s membership of the Bar in Romania was not valid for providing immigration services in the UK, Mr Jamil said: “I had no idea.”

Burlow & Spencer was one of the companies claiming supervision by DDR, and its website says it employs “a team of highly qualified and extremely knowledgeable lawyers”.

But after receiving 95 complaints about the firm and a two-year investigation, the OISC challenged DDR’s claim to being qualified to provide supervision, meaning any immigration advice given was unregulated and therefore illegal.

The court was told that Burlow & Spencer staff encouraged clients to lie to the Home Office to secure their visa applications.

Burlow & Spencer has now ceased trading, with former clients being advised to contact Fortis Insolvency in respect of fees paid or the return of documents.

Judge Sarah Munro QC said the case would “inevitably result in financial penalties”, and adjourned sentencing until September, after consideration of a financial investigation and possible confiscation orders.

OISC deputy commissioner Dr Ian Leigh said: “In a devious and calculating way over a considerable period of time the scheme put in place by DDR Legal Service LLP, was successful in dishonestly taking a significant amount of money from vulnerable people.

“There was a total disregard for statutory requirements, and they acted in deliberate defiance of the law. The degree of culpability is high, as is the harm they have caused.

“They owe a considerable amount of money to individuals and by the high number of complaints against Burlow & Spencer alone, they have clearly undermined the immigration system.

“These are serious offences that are aggravated by a knowing and calculating disregard of the statutory regime; the sophistication of the offences is reflected by the time and effort put in by officers of the OISC to investigate and prosecute.”

    Readers Comments

  • jim holloway says:

    OISC allowed this outfit to continue operating when it was obviously a scam, which was flagged up to them by concerned advisors as well as customers whose lives have been trashed.

  • Gelila Hagos says:

    I am victim by burlow and spencer. They ripped of my £4000 . How do i get my money back?

  • Myleene says:

    I lost over £2000 to them and now 10 years of my life. Now I have start paying for my visa from the beginning again. How do I get my money back please? Or some sort of help so the Home Office might reconsidered my case please?

  • mohsin nawaz says:

    I lost over £3000 to there anyway to get back my money.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Microsoft 365’s dirty little secret

Microsoft 365 (formerly called Office 365) is one of the most widely used cloud services in the world, controlling around 48% of the market share for major office suites.

A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.

NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.

Loading animation