The commercial law firm that came in from the cold – newest ABS embraces regulation

Print This Post

2 November 2012


Quinn: ABS is natural step

A business offering corporate and commercial legal services has entered into regulation by becoming the newest alternative business structure (ABS) licensed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Birmingham-based Legal Clarity offers legal drafting and company secretarial services to accountants, solicitors and entrepreneurs. Set up in 2007, it has not needed to be regulated as it does not conduct reserved legal activities.

However, James Quinn, its new head of legal practice, told Legal Futures that the company has always been run along law firm lines and that the reason for not becoming regulated before now was because it has a non-lawyer investor. “This has always been the plan. It’s a natural step for us,” he said.

Mr Quinn – formerly of Slaughter & May and Eversheds – said ABS status was aimed solely at giving Legal Clarity’s clients the “extra reassurance” they would expect when taking advice on substantive legal matters. Though the firm may use the licence to expand into reserved services, this will only be a small part of its practice.

The business has 10 staff split equally between solicitors – who are now obtaining practising certificates – and IT programmers. Mr Quinn explained that “we leverage technology as much as we can to deliver fixed-cost legal services”. The work for accountants is to provide a full range of company/commercial law services; for other solicitors it tends to be specialist advice – on a “silent and unbranded basis”, says Legal Clarity’s website – where they do not have the expertise in-house.

Mr Quinn said he had found the ABS application process “very straightforward… I was pleasantly surprised”. Legal Clarity submitted its stage 2 application in July and had asked for the licence to be issued by 1 November.

 

Tags: , , ,



One Response to “The commercial law firm that came in from the cold – newest ABS embraces regulation”

  1. Good to see the ABS structure fit naturally into the existing activities of a commercial law firm. If only they were all this straightforward!

  2. Kerry Quinn on November 2nd, 2012 at 3:17 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How to make a case to the unconverted

Jonathan Whittle

The prospect of change is a daunting one, whether you’re a global firm or a small one. You might think that your firm’s working practices are fine, or that there’s no value in altering the way you do things because of the disruption it would cause. You might even see the benefits of using a different methodology, but still refuse to put the effort in to implement it – and you wouldn’t be alone. From our research in the 2016 report, The Riddle of Perception, we know that 73% of lawyers believe that adapting to change is not where their strength lies. However, it’s no longer optional.

November 16th, 2017