Technology “can help conveyancers meet consumer demands”

Property transctions: technology can help with transparency

Only a tiny number of conveyancing firms are committed to innovation, while consumers are pressing for technology that gives them access to information, according to a survey of conveyancers.

Separately, a leading property services business claimed conveyancers were “very close” to adopting technology that would bring transparency to the market, for example allowing home-movers to see what stage a transaction had reached.

A survey of 178 legal professionals by conveyancing software business InfoTrack found that, while they agreed that new technology helped them to stay competitive, just 3% said their firms had resource dedicated to R&D or innovation.

Half said decisions were “ad hoc” as to whether or not their firms adopted new technology.

A third (34%) believed firms should constantly explore and trial new tech in order to be effective and efficient.

InfoTrack said previous research had found a big appetite among home-movers for the use of technology by their conveyancers that would improve digital communication and access to real-time information about their transaction.

This accorded with the conclusions of a report by tmgroup, a leading provider of search and other services to conveyancers.

Written by tmgroup’s chief executive Joe Pepper, it said the market was “very close to being able to work within a digital framework”, such as ‘digital vaults’ in which “relevant information and data relating to a transaction is stored and securely made available to each authorised party”.

He continued: “Integration with case management systems could also help to ensure that all parties are able to see where each professional is in the process, and communicate directly with the other professionals involved in the transaction.

“The consumer could then be kept up-to-date through a website or mobile app, prompting them to complete their own tasks, and providing an audit trail to avoid the potential different parties blaming each other for a lack of progression.”

He added: “For everyone connected in the chain, these changes cannot come quickly enough, as poor communication is routinely blamed by all parties involved for property transactions falling through.

“It is not surprising, considering that much of the property transaction is shared across disparate emails and telephone conversations, which can result in delays and confusion.”

Mr Pepper said lenders and surveyors were already using “decision-making engines” to make risk-based decisions rapidly.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Jeff Zindani

The growth game – better to buy than build?

A law firm without a growth strategy is like any business that fails to plan for the future. It may continue to thrive in the short term but in the long term it is unlikely to succeed.

Preparing your staff for returning to the office

A recent story hit the headlines that CEOs were struggling to get their employees back into the office following the lifting of Covid-19 restrictions.

Litigation funding: Maturity and mergers

The general industry consensus is that multiple new entrants will continue to enter the litigation funding market, attracted by what they perceive as the potential gains and the lack of barriers to entry.

Loading animation