Swiss firm seeks Brexit benefits with ABS launch


Domitille Baizeau and Marc Veit

A Swiss law firm that specialises in arbitration work has received an alternative business structure (ABS) licence to open up in London.

LALIVE, a 20-partner firm with offices in Geneva and Zurich, is expecting Brexit to lead to an increase in international arbitrations in the UK.

Some 45 of its 70 lawyers handle arbitration work, and the City office will be led by partners Marc Veit, a Swiss lawyer, and Timothy Foden, an American lawyer who has also qualified as a solicitor. The firm has eight other solicitors in its ranks.

The focus of the London office will be international commercial arbitration, investment treaty arbitration and public international law; LALIVE does not intend to practise English litigation.

Mr Veit told Legal Futures that the firm had set up as an ABS so that it could “incorporate academics, particularly in field of public international law, into the firm”.

There are no plans for any other non-lawyer owners or investors.

Domitille Baizeau, LALIVE’s co-managing partner, who will spend “considerable” time in London, said that, though it already handled common law cases, it was time for the firm to have a physical foothold in the common law world.

The hope is that the new office will enable LALIVE to generate more inbound litigation and white-collar crime instructions, including investigations, asset tracing and private wealth, for its team based in Switzerland by strengthening relationships with English and US law firms based in the City.

Then there was the attraction of Brexit. Mr Veit predicted that, by being outside of the EU, London may become more attractive as a venue for international arbitration “because it may be seen as being more neutral” and not bound by EU law.

“That is the case already for Switzerland. In any event, Brexit will increase volatility in the market, which in turn tends to bring more disputes.”

He added that being in London also provided greater access to third-party funders, whose offering was “really gaining traction in investment treaty arbitrations and commercial arbitrations”.

“We obviously have quite good relationships with third-party funders but it is much easier to be able to meet them face-to-face – it can make a difference, particularly at the beginning of a case.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

20 September 2018
Simon McCrum

Why don’t lawyers do what you ask them to do?

Having been team leader, department head, division head and managing partner, I understand well the frustration (and anger) that managing partners and CEOs voice to me: “We’ve asked them a dozen times, but still they aren’t doing what we need!”

Read More