Suspended jail sentence for client over unpaid Farrer & Co bill


Meyer: Ordered to attend court in person

The High Court has issued a suspended jail sentence for contempt against a high-profile entrepreneur who owes London law firm Farrer & Co £200,000 in unpaid fees.

Mr Justice Kerr said Julie Marie Meyer – who back in 2009 appeared as a ‘Dragon’ in an online version of the BBC’s Dragon’s Den – had shown herself in the proceedings “to be a selfish and untrustworthy person”.

She needed to learn, he went on, that the court was “not to be trifled with”.

An American businesswoman now resident in Switzerland, Ms Meyer received an MBE in 2011 for services to entrepreneurship.

She instructed Farrer & Co in early 2018 but later that year the firm ceased to act. In November 2019, the firm sued for unpaid fees of £187,000 plus interest and obtained default judgment the following month.

In January 2020, the court issued a standard order under CPR 71, endorsed with penal notices, requiring Ms Meyer to attend in March to provide information about her means.

She did not comply and there have been various hearings since, including one in October 2021 that Ms Meyer attended remotely, at which Mrs Justice Heather Williams ordered that she provide various documents. This has also not been complied with.

In the latest ruling, Kerr J rejected Ms Meyer’s applications to set aside the default judgment and for more time to comply with Williams J’s order.

He went on to consider whether to make Ms Meyer subject to a suspended sanction for contempt of court for that non-compliance.

“I am satisfied that this is an appropriate case to exercise that jurisdiction,” he decided.

“The defendant has shown herself in these proceedings to be a selfish and untrustworthy person, her word counts for nothing if it suits her to break it, she shows indifference to the respect properly due to the court and to the financial and resource burdens to which she continues to subject the clamant and the court.

“It is necessary, in my judgment, to teach her that the court is not to be trifled with.”

A sentence of imprisonment was “appropriate and necessary because the breach is deliberate, cynical and continuing and because, on the evidence before me, I am satisfied there is every prospect that the defendant will continue to flout orders of the court unless coerced into obeying them”, the judge said.

“I will make an order holding the defendant in contempt and imposing on her a sentence of imprisonment for six months.”

Required by the CPR to suspend the sentence, the judge ordered full compliance with the disclosure requirements and for Ms Meyer to attend court in person.

Kerr J was sceptical of Ms Meyer’s claim to be medically unfit to attend this hearing in person due to conjunctivitis.

“The medical evidence, such as it is, supporting that is not adequate. It does not support the proposition that she is unfit to attend in person yet fit to attend remotely.”

He allowed her to attend remotely “with some hesitation”, adding that he was providing “ample time to arrange travel” for the next hearing.

Legal Futures understands that Ms Meyer did not attend the hearing, which was held last week, and that a warrant has been issued for her arrest.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.


NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.


Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.


Loading animation