Survey: strong interest in MDPs and external capital among big firms


Murphy: deals could transform professional services sector very quickly

There is strong interest among the UK’s largest law firms in joining forces with a non-legal practice in the next two years, while several are also looking at external capital, according to new research.

Some 21 top-40 firms responded to the poll by accountants Smith & Williamson, and three said a tie-up with a non-legal practice was ‘likely’, with a further six considering it ‘possible’.

Six firms from the top 40 said they may seek external finance; five are considering private equity, one potentially raising over £50m.

“This could transform, not just the provision of legal services, but the entire professional services sector within a very short space of time,” said Giles Murphy, head of professional practices at Smith & Williamson.

Unexpectedly, the interest in a deal with a non-legal firm was stronger among the bigger players in the top 100 than the smaller – seven of 33 firms from 41-100 that took part in the survey expressed interest. Overall this suggests that 30% of the top 100 may seek to become an alternative business structure.

A quarter of the surveyed respondents who were interested in a deal with another type of professional saw accountants as their preferred type of firm, followed by patent agents and surveyors.

External finance would be used to fund the long-term development of the practice, develop further sectors and to fund recruitment of teams and acquisitions.

Acquisition of teams is already rife, with nearly half of the top-40 firms, and 36% of the top 100 overall, acquiring at least one team in the last year. Three teams changing hands included over 20 people although the majority were of five individuals or less.

Mr Murphy said: “As it becomes increasingly difficult for firms to grow organically in today’s tough environment, there is a clear appetite for acquiring teams from others. Given that the Legal Services Act provides an additional source of funding, we should expect to see firms taking advantage of this in the near future as a way of funding an acceleration of growth through acquisitions and team moves.”

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation