Sunak promises ministerial action over SSB Law collapse


Shah: Government response needed

The collapse of SSB Law and impact on its former clients came to the attention of Rishi Sunak this week after it was raised at Prime Minister’s Questions.

Several MPs with affected constituents have been active in campaigning to minimise the fallout and one of them, Naz Shah, Labour MP for Bradford West, put her concerns to Mr Sunak.

She said: “The prime minister is no doubt aware of the collapse of SSB Law, and many constituents, including hundreds in my constituency, have been affected and have bills of up to hundreds of thousands.

“One constituent had to sell his wedding gifts, and his father had a heart attack with the stress. People are having to raid their pension pots; they are getting bills, and bailiffs are knocking on the door.

“Will the prime minister meet me and my constituents’ representatives on the collapse of SSB Law, and make sure that the government respond to this injustice that has happened to people across the country?”

Mr Sunak replied: “I am sorry to hear about the situation impacting the honourable lady’s constituents. I will be more than happy to make sure that the right minister looks into it and that we get back to her as soon as possible.”

In February, ITV News featured a meeting Ms Shah held with 20 of her constituents who were clients of SSB, which she described as “both a local crisis and a national scandal”.

The focus of the story is on the cavity wall insulation claims SSB ran where the after-the-event (ATE) insurance it put in place is being repudiated, leading to successful defendants and their insurers seeking to enforce substantial costs awards against clients.

We reported a week ago that the Legal Services Board is to probe the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s actions in the lead-up to the collapse of SSB Group.

There have been questions about whether the regulator could have done more to identify problems at SSB, which went into administration in January owing six litigation funders £200m. Its indebtedness has since risen to £221m.





Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


On good authority? GenAI and the reputational risks to law firms

As GenAI’s influence grows, so do the risks which are already playing out in courtrooms across England and Wales, where some early adopters are setting precedents they would rather not.


Why this is the year for law firms to embrace generative AI

After more than a year of pilots, proofs of value and early experimentation, firms are increasingly embedding AI into day-to-day workflows.


Client account interest is not spare change

The proposed Interest on Lawyers’ Client Accounts scheme is being framed as a sensible, international, “tried and tested” way for the profession to help fund a justice system under strain.


Loading animation