SRA warns litigators not to become “hired guns”

Print This Post

23 March 2015

Philip: risk management tools

Philip: risk management tools

Litigation solicitors were today warned by their regulator not to prioritise the client’s interest over their other duties, stressing that they are not “hired guns”.

Balancing conflicting pressures in litigation was an occupational hazard for solicitors and clear cases of “excessive zeal” were “relatively rare”, the Solicitors Regulation Authority acknowledged in its 15-page report, Walking the line: the balancing of duties in litigation.

But solicitors’ duties to the court, third parties and the public interest should be balanced against fearlessly advancing their clients’ cases, it said.

Although access to justice for anyone with a reasonable case had to be protected, solicitors engaging in so-called “predatory litigation” – in which litigation was unnecessary or clients were induced to proceed despite there being no legal merit – and knowingly taking on weak or unwinnable cases, had been found to occur.

While conditional or contingency fee agreements mitigated the risk of this latter behaviour by giving solicitors a financial stake in cases’ outcomes, “there is evidence of misuse of such agreements”, the SRA claimed.

An example was the use of cancellation clauses in the agreements, where the solicitor cited “reasons that were already known to the solicitor from the outset”. This meant “the client had gained no benefit but incurred expense and a loss of time”.

Other improper behaviours displayed by solicitors unduly prioritising the client’s interest over their other duties included:

  • Litigation against third parties using the threat of litigation to obtain settlement, where cases have no real merit but where the cost of settlement is less than the cost of fighting the claim;
  • Abuse of the litigation process for purposes not directly connected to a dispute, such as “incurring unmanageable costs for a commercial rival of a client”;
  • Taking unfair advantage of a third party, such as exploiting their lack of legal knowledge; and
  • Excessive litigation, where a solicitor follows a client’s wish to pursue aggressive or speculative litigation.

Paul Philip, the SRA’s chief executive, said the Walking the line report was one in a series aimed at assisting firms to deal with risk. He said: “Firms and solicitors will want to read these short reports and think about how they could use them to inform their own risk management.”


One Response to “SRA warns litigators not to become “hired guns””

  1. May I offer another hired gun scenario. A long time stalker reverses the victim hood and claims questionable events in an affidavit with no evidence to back up his claims. The solicitor does not check out the case history and knows his client is legal aided, so is going to get paid regardless of the harm caused to the third party. The victim is re-victimised by the stalker and aided by his solicitor who acted as a “hired gun” to further harass and distress. Its not just money opportunist client’s are after, its further distress and financial costs to their target. I appreciate this will not be posted as I feel this practice is very much protected. Its sad to see that truth is not relevant when it comes to justice. I won my case by the way. I also paid for it. In many ways.

  2. Vicky Clarke on September 29th, 2016 at 1:23 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Court modernisation: Court Service spins response to NAO report

Roger Smith

After months of debate on the court modernisation programme led by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service, we now have an authoritative analysis from the National Audit Office. HMCTS chief executive Susan Acland-Hood professed herself happy. The report was “helpful and constructive”. She was pleased that “the NAO acknowledges our ‘early progress’”. Her comments were more reflective of spin than the span of the NAO report. The NAO acknowledges the ambitious nature of the reform. But comments like “HMCTS’s change portfolio presents a very significant challenge” need minimal decoding to reveal a bit of concern.

May 17th, 2018