SRA takes action against two ex-Axiom Ince employees


Axiom Ince: SFO investigation

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has banned two former employees of Axiom Ince from working in the profession in future without its permission.

The orders under section 43 of the Solicitors Act 1974 – which are used to control the employment of non-solicitors involved in misconduct – were made nearly three weeks ago but their publication was delayed at the request of the Serious Fraud Office, which is investigating what happened at Axiom Ince.

According to the SRA notice, between 5 May 2021 and 27 July 2023, Muhammed Ali “caused or allowed” payments totalling £54.5m to be improperly made from Axiom Ince’s bank account “when he knew or ought to have known that those transfers were improper”.

Further, in the same period, “he caused or allowed that money to be misused or be misappropriated”.

Also, on 16 June 2023, Mr Ali – whose last known address was in High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire – “allowed a third party to believe something was true when he knew it was not or had no honest reason to believe it was”.

The conduct of Jayesh Anjaria, whose last known address was Edgware, Greater London, took placed between 1 and 4 August 2023 during the course of the SRA’s forensic investigation of Axiom Ince.

He “altered bank statements of Barclays bank such that they contained false and misleading information when he knew, suspected or intended that the SRA and others who might read the bank statements that they would be misled”.

Last month, responding to the suggestion that Axiom Ince cases could reach the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal in mid-2025, SRA chief executive Paul Philip said it had agreed to pause regulatory action while the Serious Fraud Office carries out its investigation.

The orders come at the end of a bruising week for the SRA, after a report commissioned by the Legal Services Board found that the regulator “did not take all the steps it could or should have taken” ahead of the collapse of Axiom Ince. As a result, the board is to take enforcement action against the SRA.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


AML lacks clarity – and standards are suffering

If firms are buckling under the pressure of AML regulations, subject to ever-increasing fines, then something is clearly not working as it should be.


The power of participation for trainees and apprentices

It’s important as a trainee or an apprentice to get involved in the life of your firm – even under the pressure of discovering how to navigate professional life and now the demands of the SQE.


Is it time to change how law firms view compliance?

Although COFAs often hold senior positions and play an essential role in a firm’s financial and regulatory integrity, the perception of the compliance function itself is still evolving.


Loading animation