SRA takes action against two ex-Axiom Ince employees


Axiom Ince: SFO investigation

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has banned two former employees of Axiom Ince from working in the profession in future without its permission.

The orders under section 43 of the Solicitors Act 1974 – which are used to control the employment of non-solicitors involved in misconduct – were made nearly three weeks ago but their publication was delayed at the request of the Serious Fraud Office, which is investigating what happened at Axiom Ince.

According to the SRA notice, between 5 May 2021 and 27 July 2023, Muhammed Ali “caused or allowed” payments totalling £54.5m to be improperly made from Axiom Ince’s bank account “when he knew or ought to have known that those transfers were improper”.

Further, in the same period, “he caused or allowed that money to be misused or be misappropriated”.

Also, on 16 June 2023, Mr Ali – whose last known address was in High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire – “allowed a third party to believe something was true when he knew it was not or had no honest reason to believe it was”.

The conduct of Jayesh Anjaria, whose last known address was Edgware, Greater London, took placed between 1 and 4 August 2023 during the course of the SRA’s forensic investigation of Axiom Ince.

He “altered bank statements of Barclays bank such that they contained false and misleading information when he knew, suspected or intended that the SRA and others who might read the bank statements that they would be misled”.

Last month, responding to the suggestion that Axiom Ince cases could reach the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal in mid-2025, SRA chief executive Paul Philip said it had agreed to pause regulatory action while the Serious Fraud Office carries out its investigation.

The orders come at the end of a bruising week for the SRA, after a report commissioned by the Legal Services Board found that the regulator “did not take all the steps it could or should have taken” ahead of the collapse of Axiom Ince. As a result, the board is to take enforcement action against the SRA.




Blog


Mazur: a symptom not a cause?

If Mazur is a symptom, what does it mean for the underlying health of our civil justice system: the ‘finest legal system in the world’?


Cross-generation collaboration: the key to in-house legal tech adoption

In-house legal function leaders will increasingly have to evolve their thinking on how to manage multigenerational teams containing differing levels of technological expertise.


AI and law firm risk – the view of professional indemnity insurers

In considering law firm applications for cover, many insurers will expect to see evidence of how firms are adapting to AI and preparing for the future.


Loading animation