SRA removes both 80-year-old solicitor and “dishonest” trainee from profession

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

7 December 2017

SRA: Firm withheld legal aid money for years

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has removed from the profession two people at opposite ends of their careers – an 80-year-old solicitor who held unpaid disbursements in his office account, and a trainee solicitor who used client money to try and hide her mistakes.

Alan Thompson accepted a rebuke and undertook to remove himself from the roll of solicitors under a regulatory settlement agreement struck with the SRA.

Mr Thompson was a partner at south London firm Cook Taylor for 43 years, before retiring in 2013. A 2SRA investigation found that the firm had, since at least 2001, routinely been holding legal aid monies in relation to unpaid disbursements in office account – sometimes for years.

A minimum cash shortage of £53,634.79 was identified in his firm’s accounts in respect of this money. “The effect was to bolster the firm’s financial cash flow,” the agreement noted. The SRA shut down the firm in November 2016.

As a partner, Mr Thompson had responsibility for ensuring compliance with the accounts rules in place at the time, and for the effective management of the firm.

Mr Thompson admitted breaching the accounts rules by not transferring the money to client account within the prescribed timescale, and by not having appropriate systems and controls in place to ensure the proper treatment of client money.

Accordingly, he failed to run the business of the firm or carry out his role in the firm effectively in breach of the Code of Conduct.

The SRA said that, in deciding a rebuke was proportionate, it took into account that Mr Thompson retired in 2013, was 80 years of age and “in poor health”, and has no intention of practising as a solicitor in the future.

Meanwhile, the SRA has made Holly Johnson of Denton, Manchester subject to a section 43 order, which bans a non-solicitor from working in an SRA-regulated practice without its permission.

She began working as a trainee solicitor with Cheadle firm Priority Law in July 2015, but was dismissed 17 months later after being found to have used money that the firm was holding for a client to cover up mistakes that she had made on five separate matters, and then changed the matter name to try and conceal the payment requests she made.

The SRA said this conduct was dishonest. In addition to the section 43 order, she was rebuked and ordered to pay a fine of £2,000, the highest sanction the SRA can hand out short of sending a case to a disciplinary tribunal.

The regulator said: “It is not known whether Miss Johnson is currently working at a SRA regulated practice.”

One Response to “SRA removes both 80-year-old solicitor and “dishonest” trainee from profession”

  1. SRA should get it’s own house in order. Hey take millions from the public purse and yet refused on three occasions to regulate a law firm committing fraud against my wife.

  2. Richard on December 8th, 2017 at 7:12 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Why your firm should support working mothers to the hilt

Georgina Hamblin

If you are going to balance the demands of work and childcare, and stay sane, you need to adapt, and with any luck your firm will adapt with you. In doing so you will both win, and your respective productivity will soar. When I had my son, I realised just how lucky I was. Not only did I have the incredible support of my, and my husband’s, family through this life-changing time, but I had a firm that offered me complete flexibility and control over my return to business life.

April 19th, 2018