SRA rejects bid to give law firms open access to BARCO


money

Risks must be “very low” for law firms to put money in BARCO

A request by the Bar Council for law firms to be given automatic access to BARCO was rejected by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), it has emerged.

BARCO, the third-party escrow account that allows barristers to handle client money, was launched by Michael Todd QC, former chairman of the Bar Council, early last year.

Crispin Passmore, executive director at the SRA, said yesterday that the Bar Council’s request for a general waiver giving solicitors access had been rejected.

Mr Passmore said individual requests by law firms or chambers for a waiver would be considered, as long as the risks were “very low”, but none had been received.

He added that the question of access to BARCO could be considered when the SRA consults on a complete overhaul of the Solicitors Accounts Rules next year, due to be implemented in April 2016.

A spokesman for the Bar Council confirmed that it had received a letter from the SRA saying it was not in a position to give a “general waiver around client account rules to solicitors’ firms that want to use BARCO” but would consider individual waivers.

Paul Mosson, the Bar Council’s director of operations, representation, policy and services, said: “While there are clear benefits to solicitors’ firms and other legal entities in using BARCO for holding client funds, our members – barristers – must come first.

“We will be conducting focus groups as well as other market research on whether there is a benefit to Bar Council members in extending the advantages of BARCO beyond the Bar.

“The obvious advantage to solicitors is that BARCO provides more robust protection for client funds than the current set up they face. It may also be that it can act as a more suitable way for solicitors to pay fees owed to barristers from client funds.”

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation