SRA issues first fixed penalty fine for diversity data failure


Diversity: Firm required to provide workforce data

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has handed out the first fixed penalty fine for a law firm’s failure to submit its workforce diversity data within the deadline.

Leicester firm HG Legal has been fined £750, with costs of £150, for failing to comply with the SRA’s request, made under paragraph 1.5 of its code of conduct for firms, which requires them to “monitor, report and publish workforce diversity data, as prescribed”.

Firms are required to respond to SRA requests like this under paragraph 3.3(a) of the code. HG Legal has now done so.

Fixed penalties form part of the SRA’s new fining powers introduced in 2022 and are published on the SRA website. They are being piloted with a small number of lower-level breaches breaches by firms; in November, three firms that failed to comply with the transparency rules became the first to receive fixed £750 fines under the regime.

As well as the transparency rules and failing to provide information or documentation requested or required by the SRA – a declaration of compliance with anti-money laundering requirements is another example – failing to ensure approval of role holders like compliance officers can also lead to a fixed penalty.

A second offence within three years leads to a £1,500 fine.

The SRA is set to consult this year on fixed penalties for minor anti-money laundering system and control failings, although the amount of the fine could be higher.

The regulator published its biennial collection of the profession’s diversity data last month, reporting on a “slow but steady increase in diversity among all lawyers”, but especially among smaller law firms.




Blog


Why law firms are getting AI supervision wrong

The profession’s response to AI supervision failures misunderstands the nature of LLM output – there needs to be for a shift in the culture.


Beyond the PII premium – rethinking risk

Professional indemnity insurance renewal is often treated as an annual pricing exercise. But it is also a chance to show how effectively you identify, manage and mitigate risk.


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Loading animation