SRA hands out first fixed penalties for AML information failures


AML: Firms did not provide information

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has issued the first fixed fines to firms that failed to provide it with information about their anti-money laundering and sanctions controls.

Three law firms have been ordered to pay a fixed financial penalty of £750 each and costs of £150.

They are recLAW in Hove and two west London law firms, Sayers Solicitors and Piper May Solicitors.

Each was requested to provide the SRA with data in respect of its anti-money laundering and sanctions requirements.

They failed to respond promptly, as required, and failed to remedy the breach after being given notice and reasonable time in which to do so.

The SRA started handing out fixed financial penalties from autumn 2023 for a limited number of specified, non-complex administrative breaches of its rules. To date, these have been non-compliance with the transparency rules, failing to respond to requests for diversity data, and not updating information about compliance officers.

According to the most recent, if outdated, SRA data, it issued 73 from mid-2023 to 31 October 2024.

The fine doubles to £1,500 for a subsequent breach of the same category within three years.

Alexandra Jones, the SRA’s director of anti-money laundering, said: “Firms must respond to our requests for AML and sanctions information. Money laundering is a significant threat to the economy and the legal sector is a potential facilitator.

“Collecting data allows us to focus on risk, target our inspections and reduce the burden on firms where we can. We are here to support firms that look to comply but will take action where there is repeated non-compliance.”

The SRA is planning to expand the range of matters that can lead to a fixed penalty to include some administrative failures to meet the requirements of the proposed new accountants’ reports regime.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


How unstoppable AI is reshaping UK legal practice

At a time when most technology innovation still flows from the US and China, UK lawtech is attracting growing international attention and capital.


Modern vehicles: new injury profiles and new legal challenges

As the number of electric vehicles on UK roads continues to grow year-on-year, it is important to address the risks that come with their increased adoption.


The SRA needs to admit it got it wrong about SLAPPs

The High Court judgment in Ashley Hurst v SRA in January raises serious questions about the regulator’s approach to allegations of SLAPP-like behaviour.


Loading animation