SRA hands out another big fine for AML non-compliance


AML: Long-term failures to comply

A law firm in Essex is the latest to receive a hefty fine from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) for not complying with anti-money laundering rules.

Symons Gay & Leland in Ilford was fined more than £12,000 after the regulator found that it did not have in place a fully compliant firm-wide risk assessment for more than five years to the end of 2022.

It also did not have fully compliant policies, controls and procedures for six years, and failed to undertake proper client/matter risk assessments on five files.

These are all required by the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017.

According to an SRA notice published yesterday, the findings followed a desk-based review of the firm’s compliance and a notice first served in July 2022.

Since then, the firm’s policies have been brought into compliance and the breaches, “which were not intentional”, have been remedied, the SRA said. Symons Gay & Leland has “shown some insight and made partial admissions”.

The SRA fining guidance led to a figure of 2% of the firm’s turnover, £12,636, along with costs of £1,350.

It said the breaches formed “a pattern of misconduct”, continuing: “The firm was responsible for its own conduct which was serious and had the potential to cause harm to the public interest and to public confidence in the legal profession.”

There has been a stream of penalties over recent months for law firms that were not complying with AML rules (see here and here), and last week we reported on one of the largest, £46,000 for a Coventry law firm.




Blog


Is your Google Ads budget funding your competitors’ AI visibility?

If your cost-per-click has crept up again this year, you’ve probably assumed the market simply got more expensive. That’s the wrong way to read what’s happening.


Containing the spread of unapproved AI

Nearly 60% of fee-earners admit to using unapproved tools (like free versions of ChatGPT). Yet 68% of firm leaders are confident there is zero risk of unapproved AI being used for client work.


When AI adoption goes wrong, costs add up fast

City AM recently reported that London is fighting to claim the title of ‘global capital of legal AI’. However, it’s crucial we remember that adoption alone does not create value.


Loading animation