SRA hands out another big fine for AML non-compliance


AML: Long-term failures to comply

A law firm in Essex is the latest to receive a hefty fine from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) for not complying with anti-money laundering rules.

Symons Gay & Leland in Ilford was fined more than £12,000 after the regulator found that it did not have in place a fully compliant firm-wide risk assessment for more than five years to the end of 2022.

It also did not have fully compliant policies, controls and procedures for six years, and failed to undertake proper client/matter risk assessments on five files.

These are all required by the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017.

According to an SRA notice published yesterday, the findings followed a desk-based review of the firm’s compliance and a notice first served in July 2022.

Since then, the firm’s policies have been brought into compliance and the breaches, “which were not intentional”, have been remedied, the SRA said. Symons Gay & Leland has “shown some insight and made partial admissions”.

The SRA fining guidance led to a figure of 2% of the firm’s turnover, £12,636, along with costs of £1,350.

It said the breaches formed “a pattern of misconduct”, continuing: “The firm was responsible for its own conduct which was serious and had the potential to cause harm to the public interest and to public confidence in the legal profession.”

There has been a stream of penalties over recent months for law firms that were not complying with AML rules (see here and here), and last week we reported on one of the largest, £46,000 for a Coventry law firm.




Blog


Does the Lloyd review mark the end of the Legal Services Act?

The Legal Services Board often generates eye-rolls and irritation from the leaders of the frontline regulators it oversees and of the representative bodies attached to them.


A familiar story?

There is no doubt that the rising cost of clinical negligence claims deserves attention. However, the system’s true cost driver is often not the claim itself.


When AI becomes a line on the client’s bill

On 23 June, Legora changed how it charges. The platform announced that its most capable product was moving away from a flat per-seat licence fee to consumption-based pricing


Loading animation