SRA fails in bid to increase disciplinary sanction on solicitor fined for money laundering conviction


Kaduragamuwa: SDT adopted correct approach to sanctions

The High Court has rejected the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) bid to increase the sanction imposed on a solicitor convicted of transferring criminal property after being taken in by a charismatic conman posing as the Pope’s banker.

Buddika Kadurugamuwa was naïve but not dishonest, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) said in explaining why it considered a £2,000 fine sufficient penalty for her misconduct.

Ms Kadurugamuwa received a six-month suspended sentence and ordered to carry out 125 hours of unpaid work after transferring £111,400 into an HSBC account in her husband’s name when Luis Nobre told her he was closing down his account and needed to move the money.

It turned out that the money came from a €100m (£73m) scam Mr Nobre had pulled off. He is now serving a 14-year jail sentence.

The SRA told the High Court that Ms Kadurugamuwa should have been either struck off or suspended for her misconduct.

It argued that the tribunal had sent a message that the profession regarded this kind of offending as trivial.

The ruling has not yet been published, according to a report on Lawtel, the court found that the tribunal had adopted the correct approach to sanctions.

“It had considered mitigation and concluded that the misconduct was serious because it involved the commission of a criminal offence of which K had been convicted and involved, admitted and proved breaches of the principles, but that taking into account her level of culpability, the harm caused and the aggravating and mitigating factors, the level of seriousness was towards the lower end of the spectrum.

“The question was whether the financial sanction was wrong and outside the appropriate bracket. In the absence of an error of law, the High Court had to pay considerable respect to the tribunal’s sentencing decisions.

“The tribunal stated that the sanction it imposed would always be case specific. Although the issues were finely balanced, the court concluded with some hesitation that on the facts the sanction imposed was not outside the ambit of the tribunal’s powers.”

An SRA spokesman said: “We treat any matter which could raise money laundering issues extremely seriously. In this instance the solicitor had already been found guilty of the criminal offence of transferring criminal property. We are disappointed with the decision not to increase the sanction.”

 




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

14 November 2018

How accessible is your recruitment process?

Recognising the benefits of employing disabled people in the legal profession, and attracting talented disabled candidates is a great start, but of little use if your recruitment process is not inclusive nor accessible.

Read More