SRA eyes pilot to promote greater unbundling of legal services


SRA: Looking to understand barriers to unbundling

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is planning a pilot with other legal regulators on how to extend the use of unbundling, it has emerged.

In April, the Legal Services Consumer Panel (LSCP) issued a report highlighting the “untapped potential” of unbundling and last moth held a roundtable to discuss it further.

Summary notes of the meeting said the SRA “accepted the potential to provide fuller guidance or a stronger steer” on unbundling and said the starting point should be “a better understanding” of the barriers.

The SRA “offered to facilitate a pilot on unbundled legal services in collaboration with other regulators, including service providers where feasible”.

The regulator “noted the importance of understanding consumers’ needs and expectations”, including the role of new technology to facilitate unbundling.

The SRA’s offer to lead a pilot was welcomed, with a “strong consensus” at the roundtable that the proposal to create a group for the purposes of exploring one was “a positive move forward”.

The panel said: “There was consensus about untapped potential of unbundled legal services in the market and that regulators could do more to support providers and consumers access this type of service.”

Legal Connection, a service which links lawyers who know each other so they can collaborate remotely, “provided a live demo in the use of unbundling of legal services where consumers can have a follow up chat with the provider, access the same documents and are assigned tasks with clear deadlines”.

Online legal services provider Rocket Lawyer, which targets individuals and SMEs, said it had noticed a “sharp increase” in workload during the pandemic.

The company “provided a real case study on unbundling that showed how they can make legal service more affordable, where the consumer saved between 40-50% in legal fees”.

Rocket Lawyer argued that “most areas of law can be unbundled”, while Legal Connection “raised the importance of educating lawyers to expand their services via self-service portals to reduce administrative tasks and focus on delivering the analytic part of the service”.

The consumer panel stressed the need to carry out research and test demand before expanding unbundling beyond the pilot project.

It said the development of unbundling should take account of “continually developing” court processes, which would “provide additional opportunities for unbundling because some consumers will be able to navigate legal administrative processes more easily”.

Regulators could play a role in offering support to lawyers needing to assess consumers’ capability.

The Law Society welcomed the increased use of unbundling and said its members were “likely to see unbundling as positive because it offers great commercial incentives, and it frees lawyers from administrative tasks”.

The Ministry of Justice said it would consider how it could support the unbundling of services to increase access to justice.

“Attendees agreed that there is a need for more information for consumers and providers on unbundling of services, and that ‘one size fits all’ solutions should be avoided,” the summary added.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Automated justice: striking the balance in injury claims

No professional sector is immune from automation – even the law. However, the adoption of automated systems to settle routine injury claims raises a number of important ethical questions.


Conveyancers: are you afraid of outsourcing?

For many years, outsourcing has been seen as a bit of a scary prospect within the conveyancing sector. But thanks to the stamp duty holiday, conveyancers are now realising some of the many benefits.


You win some, you lose some – class actions post Google

In November, Google received two court rulings, through which it both closed and opened the door to class actions against it. So what do the decisions mean for future class actions?


Loading animation