SRA, BSB and other regulators join forces to demystify the law for consumers

Print This Post

22 January 2014

Townsend: website aims to empower consumers

The frontline legal regulators yesterday launched a groundbreaking consumer-facing information website that aims to demystify the legal profession for ordinary people.

Legal Choices does not link consumers to individual lawyers but addresses a variety of perceived gaps in the public’s knowledge of the legal profession. It follows research that found being unfamiliar with using a lawyer was a critical issue for consumers.

In his report to today’s Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) board meeting, chief executive Antony Townsend said: “Throughout December 2013 work continued alongside the six other legal regulators to shape the new… website.

“[It] for the first time brings together fully independent and impartial information about every type of lawyer in England and Wales. The website aims to empower consumers by providing them with the right information they might need to make good choices about legal issues and lawyers.”

The site has detailed information about the different kinds of lawyers and advice on such things as legal aid, questions to ask lawyers, legal insurance, and ‘no win, no fee’. It has a variety of links to services, such as the government-backed Money Advice Service and the Legal Ombudsman.

An interactive “Your Voice” section has “polls, surveys and quizzes” for consumers to take part in and invites comments on consumers’ experiences with lawyers. Features currently available include a link to ILEX Professional Standards’ survey on using a chartered legal executive.

A legal conundrum about a neighbour dispute over a fallen tree gives readers the chance to test their legal knowledge. In the end, one party seeks legal advice, which results in a letter that frightens the other party into paying up. But the relationship between the neighbours is ruined.

The site includes a section on legal issues, covering the spectrum of consumer law and offering “tips for surviving all sorts of legal issues, to help you work out what your legal choices are”. As it is currently configured, Legal Choices does not highlight prominently alternative forms of dispute resolution.

A report submitted to the SRA main board in September by the director of inclusion, Mehrunissa Lalani, said Legal Choices provides “a one-stop shop of factual advice and opportunities for consumers to have a say about legal services”. It would also “signpost people to information and support provided by different legal regulators and aim to help people with the choices and decisions they are faced with before, during, or after using a legal service”.

A spokesman for the Legal Services Board said the site was “a good first step towards helping consumers choose and use legal services”.

He added: “It is a positive example of the different regulators collaborating to deliver something that supports both consumer education and understanding. It addresses an identified desire from individual consumers for a one-stop source of information on legal services generally and is a good starting point in getting consumers engaged.”

Tags: , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “SRA, BSB and other regulators join forces to demystify the law for consumers”

  1. Not a bad website. Boldly consumer facing and not designed for lawyers. But they forgot about solicitor advocates which I think is a material omission.

  2. Ursula Rice on January 22nd, 2014 at 8:29 am
  3. About time. Mind you, some of it might need a little editing…
    Generally a good thing though. Hurrah!

  4. Louise Restell on January 22nd, 2014 at 3:02 pm
  5. Whilst I applaud the concept of the site I am afraid that one element in particular gives me considerable cause for concern. In attempting to explain how conditional fee agreements work it is stated with confidence that:-
    “If you win the case the other side will pay your lawyer’s costs.”
    This is simply incorrect.
    What the cfa will likely provide is:-
    “If you win your claim, you pay…..”
    The Indemnity Principle is alive and kicking – in a laudable attempt to simplify this complex area for Consumers those behind the site risk creating confusion for them. Solicitors will then have to address this confusion when they sit down with Clients to explain how cfas really work!

  6. Andrew Lund on January 23rd, 2014 at 7:51 am
  7. Following on from my last comment I am pleased to say that the web site has been amended.
    Thanks to Helen Blundell at APIL for taking this on board and also to those who maintain the website for responding so promptly.

  8. Andrew Lund on January 23rd, 2014 at 11:43 am
  9. As a social policy officer at a Citizens Advice Bureau I think this website is a valuable first step, but only a first step, towards moving the legal services sector closer to its future users.
    We are happy to promote it to frontline advisers and encourage them, and clients, to feedback on the site. We are also keen to encourage further collaborative action which increases consumer access to the legal services market.

  10. ed hodson on March 14th, 2014 at 1:03 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How best to achieve independent regulation under the Legal Services Act?

Craig Wakeford LSB

Independent regulation gives confidence to consumers, providers, investors and society as a whole that legal services work in the public interest and support the rule of law. The Legal Services Act 2007 does not require all approved regulators to be structurally separate from representative bodies. Instead, the Legal Services Board is required by the Act to produce internal governance rules (IGR) which apply the principle of regulatory independence in legal service regulation. We are currently running a consultation on the IGR which continues until 9 February.

January 19th, 2018