SRA agrees to keep Solicitors Indemnity Fund alive with £6m undertaking


SRA: SIF said it needed undertaking

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has agreed to a request from the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) to underwrite its potential liabilities in continuing to operate by providing a £6m undertaking.

Following pressure from the Law Society, the SRA agreed to the latest of a series of extensions in the life of the SIF in April this year, postponing closure by another year to September 2023, while it considers long-term options.

The SIF protects solicitors against claims made after the six-year run-off period following closure of a law firm. It was first meant to close in 2017 but has been repeatedly delayed over concerns that firm owners faced an uphill struggle to find alternative cover.

In the “unlikely event” that there was any shortfall at the SIF, the SRA said it would rely on its own reserves and then recoup the costs from the profession – this would amount to a flat charge of £624 per law firm if the full £6m was called on, although other models, such as varying the contribution based on turnover, could be adopted.

The decision to delay closure to next year was subject to the SRA receiving confirmation from SIF Ltd that this would be affordable, without the need to levy the profession to fund it.

The minutes of last month’s SRA board meeting said the chair of SIF, John Young, confirmed that without a full actuarial assessment – which would be costly and not completed before September at the earliest – the company could not confirm the affordability of a further 12-month extension without “an agreement to underwrite potential liabilities”, up to a maximum of £6m.

The SIF suggested an extension of a current £4m undertaking provided by the Law Society.

The Law Society offered to jointly fund the undertaking. The minutes recorded: “After thorough consideration the board agreed that although this offer was welcome, it would be both right and simplest for us to provide an undertaking for the entire amount requested by SIF Ltd.

“This was because, in addition to having responsibility for indemnity and insurance, including any extension to SIF provision of post six-year run-off cover and the application required to put it in place, we would also be responsible for collecting any indemnity contribution from the profession, if it were to be needed, regardless of the provider of the undertaking.”

The board agreed that the SRA would provide the undertaking and submit the application to the Legal Services Board for approval of the 12-month extension in the life of the SIF.




Blog


Small steps, big impact: how SME law firms are making legal tech work

For SME law firms, the priority is turning the potential of tech into measurable impact: success is driven not just by the technology, but by how firms approach planning and implementation.


Why housing disrepair claims against councils have leapt by nearly 400%

Housing disrepair claims against councils have surged dramatically in recent years, with some areas reporting increases approaching a staggering 400%.


Client accounts: Opportunity, obligation and the risks in between

The profitability gap between well-run firms and the rest is not primarily a function of size, location or practice area – it is a function of financial management.


Loading animation