SRA abandons indemnity cover cut this year after LSB warning


Chris Kenny

Kenny: “general absence of data” in all the submissions

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has extended the time it has given itself to decide on the proposed cut in the minimum indemnity cover limit for law firms from 10 October this year to 17 August 2015.

The SRA responded by announcing that the change “will not now come into effect before October 2014”.

The LSB’s decision came in a warning notice issued to the Law Society, informing the society that it was “considering whether to refuse in part” plans by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to cut the limit from £2m to £500,000.

The main reason given by the LSB in the notice, served under the Legal Services Act, was that the move “could be prejudicial to the regulatory objective of protecting and promoting the interests of consumers”.

In a letter to Paul Philip, chief executive of the SRA, Chris Kenny, chief executive of the LSB, said there was a “clear policy need” to examine whether the appropriate balance was being struck between client protection and additional costs to the industry.

Mr Kenny welcomed the SRA’s decision earlier this month to announce a call for evidence on its indemnity reforms.

“The LSB considers that the SRA is right to examine all the options, rather than operating on the assumption that the current position is necessarily the right basis from which only incremental change may be needed.

“It should not be taken as read that the current arrangements are underpinned by a very strong evidence base, as opposed to simply being the result of custom and practice.

“In that respect we note the general absence of data in the submissions made to the LSB by other stakeholders, as well as in the application itself.”

Mr Kenny added that there was “limited evidence” that costs savings would be achieved and the potential impact on the Compensation Fund had not been fully explored.

He said that the LSB needed further evidence by 5 September this year, to determine the application by the end of that month.

Charles Plant, chairman of the SRA, said the regulator was “obviously disappointed” that the LSB had issued the warning notice.

“The immediate impact is that the changes we have proposed in relation to reductions in mandatory cover cannot now take effect in October this year,” he said.

“In principle, I think this is the wrong decision and we remain convinced of the case for changing the arrangements for professional indemnity insurance, in order to deliver benefits for solicitors and consumers alike. We will, therefore, continue to develop our proposals on this issue.”

 

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.


NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.


Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.


Loading animation