SRA abandons indemnity cover cut this year after LSB warning

Print This Post

19 August 2014


Chris Kenny

Kenny: “general absence of data” in all the submissions

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has extended the time it has given itself to decide on the proposed cut in the minimum indemnity cover limit for law firms from 10 October this year to 17 August 2015.

The SRA responded by announcing that the change “will not now come into effect before October 2014”.

The LSB’s decision came in a warning notice issued to the Law Society, informing the society that it was “considering whether to refuse in part” plans by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to cut the limit from £2m to £500,000.

The main reason given by the LSB in the notice, served under the Legal Services Act, was that the move “could be prejudicial to the regulatory objective of protecting and promoting the interests of consumers”.

In a letter to Paul Philip, chief executive of the SRA, Chris Kenny, chief executive of the LSB, said there was a “clear policy need” to examine whether the appropriate balance was being struck between client protection and additional costs to the industry.

Mr Kenny welcomed the SRA’s decision earlier this month to announce a call for evidence on its indemnity reforms.

“The LSB considers that the SRA is right to examine all the options, rather than operating on the assumption that the current position is necessarily the right basis from which only incremental change may be needed.

“It should not be taken as read that the current arrangements are underpinned by a very strong evidence base, as opposed to simply being the result of custom and practice.

“In that respect we note the general absence of data in the submissions made to the LSB by other stakeholders, as well as in the application itself.”

Mr Kenny added that there was “limited evidence” that costs savings would be achieved and the potential impact on the Compensation Fund had not been fully explored.

He said that the LSB needed further evidence by 5 September this year, to determine the application by the end of that month.

Charles Plant, chairman of the SRA, said the regulator was “obviously disappointed” that the LSB had issued the warning notice.

“The immediate impact is that the changes we have proposed in relation to reductions in mandatory cover cannot now take effect in October this year,” he said.

“In principle, I think this is the wrong decision and we remain convinced of the case for changing the arrangements for professional indemnity insurance, in order to deliver benefits for solicitors and consumers alike. We will, therefore, continue to develop our proposals on this issue.”

 

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

New right to paid leave for bereaved parents: A welcome move

Kimberley Manning DAS

This year, like many in recent years, has seen some key changes within the employment law field, with the government, trade unions and lobbyists remaining endlessly engaged in seeking to impose their interpretation of fair balance between employers and their respective workforces. Although consensus on that equilibrium can never really be achieved, sometimes there are pieces of legislative movement which are difficult to argue with regardless of your perspective: This is one of those. Published on 13 October 2017, the Parental Bereavement (Pay and Leave) Bill would provide for the first time a legal right to parents who are employed and have suffered the death of a child, a minimum of two weeks’ leave in which to grieve.

November 20th, 2017