Solicitors' wellbeing worse than schoolteachers, study finds

Soon: Building the evidence on wellbeing in the profession

Solicitors have an even lower sense of psychological wellbeing on average than notoriously hard-pressed schoolteachers, according to research announced today to coincide with national Time to Talk day – an event held to promote speaking out about mental health.

The benchmarking study found teachers, some GPs and vets all ranked higher than lawyers. while more senior solicitors had better wellbeing then junior ones.

The research, carried out by Birkbeck psychology PhD student and former practising solicitor Lucinda Soon, compared 340 trainee and qualified solicitors using a recognised measure of wellbeing against recent NHS data on the general population and other data on UK occupational groups.

Solicitors scored 44.3 on the scale, five points lower than the national average of 49.9. Teachers scored 47.7, veterinary surgeons 48.9, and GPs in Northern Ireland 50.2.

The study also found female solicitors had “significantly” poorer wellbeing than their male counterparts. The author declined to speculate on reasons for this.

Wellbeing was lowest among solicitors with between five and 15 years’ PQE, followed by trainees and junior qualified lawyers, with more senior lawyers faring best.

This made sense because the factors most important to good psychological wellbeing, the study said, were autonomy at work, being connected and socially supported, and whether they were perceived to be effective.

Speaking to Legal Futures, Ms Soon, who would only reveal she practised in the City, regional firms and in-house but not exactly where, said she had experienced “the pressures of legal practice” and was now committed to examining wellbeing and the profession in order “to help build the evidence”.

She explained: “With evidence, we can fully understand how we can change and improve. Bridging that gap between researcher and practitioner is what I aim to do.”

She said no firm conclusions should be drawn as to why women showed lower wellbeing than men. “We might speculate multiple possible reasons but without the evidence, we would just be guessing.”

She was also reluctant to endorse the often-heard view that Millennial lawyers were willing to walk away rather than accept unduly stressful work. “I would be cautious about drawing any conclusions on this without the evidence to back it up.

“Currently, there is little evidence of generational differences, whether in law or other sectors.”

Equally, she was uncertain about whether firms were paying sufficient attention to wellbeing issues. She said: “There has been an increase in awareness of wellbeing in the legal profession, which is very much a good thing.

“We now need to build the evidence on ways we can improve and sustain lawyers’ wellbeing.”

Summing up the study, the author said: “These findings present a case for looking beyond individual-level factors of mindfulness and resilience.

“Psychological needs satisfaction in the workplace was the strongest predictor of solicitors’ wellbeing, so the question arises: how can firms and organisations improve satisfaction of those needs?

“To answer this, we need to start looking at the bigger picture, encompassing the work environment and culture in which solicitors practise.”

Elizabeth Rimmer, chief executive of lawyer wellbeing charity LawCare, commented: “This research confirms that lawyers experience poorer wellbeing than others.

“The time is now to address the culture and working practices in law that can lead to poor wellbeing, and build the social capital in the legal community to create positive change.”

Nick Bloy, founder of Wellbeing Republic, who helped produce best practice wellbeing guidance on behalf of the Law Society, added: “The results expand upon the worrying trends seen at the junior end of the profession and provide new insights into how we might be able to better support the wellbeing of lawyers beyond resilience and mindfulness training.”

Detailed findings from the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal in due course.

    Readers Comments

  • C. Kenneil says:

    Legal work often entails ardversarial issues and competing claims.
    To win, lawyers need to be highly competitive and it is relevant that consumers accuse lawyers of being ‘economical with the truth’.
    To live in chronic Competition is to prredominantly live in the ‘Fight or Flight’ system, the Sypathetic Nervous system.
    This shuts off blood to the brain, to the digestive system, the reproductive system and most importantly, to the immune system.
    In addition The sympathetic nervous system produces Cortisol and Adrenaline, closing down the ‘feel good’ hormones of the endocrine system produced from living in the Para sympathetic nervous system.
    We are still biologically built to live in our Para sympathetic nervous system, which not only produces the feel good molecules. but ensures we use correct amino petides for building healthy bodies.
    Chronic Cortisol and Adrenaline are permanent features of living in Competition, which corrodes the body and brain, interupting normal functions like sleep etc.

    The top global universities studying Epi-genetics now agree that 98% of all diseases are generated by external / internal stress, altering gene expression, and that our genes are not ‘hard wired’, except for a very few diseases with genetic inheritance. Stress or good feelings, resiliance and support play a large part in our well being.
    This has huge implications as to how we will now run our work force, family life, our society and our environment. Failing to live in intended biological compliance will produce personal unjury. This is medical fact, not political theory.
    To aligne with how Nature runs our biological systems and organs we must understand interconnections, predominantly act in co-participation, co operation and in communication.
    We need a new legal system to match the proper biological blue print both for solicitors, consumers and litigants.
    To live in a hostile environment causes Physical Injury. I thank you for bring this important subject to light.

  • Get Qoral Health says:

    Several factors may be at play for this favorable perception of the degree. Respondents reported high levels of satisfaction with the analytical and critical thinking skills they developed in law school. Law graduates also were more likely than other degree holders to agree that their studies prepared them to handle financial, legal and other personal issues. Furthermore, law graduates have the highest levels of community wellbeing when compared with other degree holders.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.


3 April 2020

In challenging times, should you move to the cloud?

Having a cloud-based system can provide workers with incredible flexibility. However, there are many things that a firm should be aware of before making the transition to the cloud.

Read More

Loading animation