Solicitors oppose move to digital signatures for LPAs

LPA: Solicitors worry about fraud

The vast majority of solicitors want to retain the rule that donors must physically sign lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) rather than move to electronic signatures, a survey has found.

This contrasts with the government’s declared aim of making the LPA signing and registration process fully electronic.

According to the 410 solicitors polled by the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG), fraud prevention was a key reason given by the 92% in favour of maintaining wet signatures.

“There was also uncertainty about what wet signatures could be replaced with in a more digital service, whilst retaining a level of safeguarding for the client,” the OPG said.

Some solicitors suggested that, as long as the donor still provided a wet signature, other ‘actors’ involved in the LPA would not – the OPG said it has marked this issue for future research.

While in some cases witnesses added no value, the survey found, where they did, it was to prevent fraud, act as a safeguard and to give the process some gravitas and formality.

“Having witnesses also introduces some friction to the process, so that the donor has time to consider the importance of the document that they’re creating,” the OPG said.

“We’ve heard some similar themes from the citizens we’ve spoken to, and it’s an area that we’ve marked for future research.”

The vast majority of respondents said they had never been concerned about the authenticity of a signature on an LPA or the identity of one of an actor on an LPA, mostly because they were done in the solicitor’s presence.

“Where it was reported that there were concerns, usually a fresh LPA was produced and signed in the presence of the solicitor to ensure the document was genuine. Around 16% of respondents said that they never check a signature on the LPA against an exemplar.”

Most solicitors said they would request a capacity assessment before making an LPA, if they felt one was needed, and would refuse to make an LPA for a client if appropriate, with lack of capacity, lack of understanding of the LPA and concerns around coercion being the most cited.

Though the majority of solicitors said they checked the donor’s ID, only 11% checked the attorneys’ ID, and even fewer check the ID of other actors on the LPA.

“This reflects the fact that the donor is the client in this situation. It may also be because in many cases, solicitors are acting as the certificate provider and colleagues as witnesses.” Indeed, 90% said they always or usually took the role of certificate provider

A little over three-quarters of solicitors said they would be willing to certify the identity of the donor, but only a third would be for the attorney.

The survey identified a disconnect between what solicitors and clients said was the reason for making LPAs: while the majority of solicitors said it was an advance move simply to prepare for the future, OPG research among consumers found that more people were making LPAs as a result of an acute need, such as a dementia diagnosis.

    Readers Comments

  • John Richard Welch says:

    There is published academic research showing that people signing a paper document are much more likely to act honestly and to have considered deeply the significance of what they are signing. “Digital signatures” are considered to carry less importance.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.

Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.

Lawyers who break AML rules face bigger, more public fines

Last month, two all-party parliamentary groups published a joint economic crime manifesto that sets out a “comprehensive list of pragmatic reforms” designed to tackle the UK’s dirty money crisis.

Loading animation