Solicitors jailed for fraud and perverting the course of justice in action against former employee

Bachada: sentenced to four and a half years in jail

Two solicitors have been jailed for a total of six years and one month for their part in committing a fraud and perverting the course of justice in bringing a £20,000 breach of contract claim against a former employee.

Diljit Bachada, 45, was the principal solicitor at Bromsgrove law firm Hollies Solicitors & Advocates. The victim was employed by the firm, but in August 2012 she resigned and there followed a dispute between the two parties about monies owed to the victim.

According to the Crown Prosecution Service, in May 2013 the victim received a £20,000 county court claim made against her by Ms Bachada for the breach of her contract of employment. Attached to this claim were two contracts, each signed by Bachada and the victim.

On closer inspection, the victim realised that she had never signed the documents.

The matter was reported to police who examined the contracts and discovered some anomalies, such as that the Law Society copyright at the foot of each page was incorrect, while a clause stated in the contract did not come into force until July 2010. But the documents had apparently been signed in January 2010.

Bachada was later arrested, as was 41-year-old Tharinjit Biring who had assisted her by providing false information in a witness statement.

Following a six-week trial at Bristol Crown Court, both defendants were found guilty – Bachada of two counts of fraud and two of perverting the course of justice, leading to a sentence of four and a half years’ imprisonment. Biring was found guilty of perverting the course of justice and sentenced to 19 months’ imprisonment.

Ian Crooks, Senior Crown Prosecutor with West Midlands Crown Prosecution Service, said: “Diljit Bachada abused her position of trust and authority to try and manipulate a civil claim against her former employee. Tharanjit Biring assisted her by providing false information in a witness statement.

“Their fraud was uncovered when the victim became suspicious about a number of documents which were sent to her which appeared to bear her signature.

“Handwriting experts concluded that these were not her signatures and investigation also uncovered incorrect use of the Law Society copyright as well as inserting a law in the contract which had not even been introduced when the contracts were alleged to have been signed.

“Both of these two individuals have brought their profession into disrepute and they will now have to deal with the consequences of their actions.”

West Mercia Police Detective Sergeant Mark Morton added: “This has been a complex case that involved a detailed analysis of legal documents to establish that they had been falsified.

“Members of the public rely on those involved in our judicial service to be totally honest and incorruptible but the actions of Dijit Bachada and Tharanjit Biring has undoubtedly damaged that trust.”

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.

NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.

Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.

Loading animation