Solicitors innocently caught up in mortgage fraud liable for whole loss


High Court: ruling on preliminary issues went for lender

Solicitors innocently caught up in frauds on mortgage lenders can find themselves liable for the whole loss if they release funds before receiving documents needed to prove title, even if the lender is negligent.

A recent High Court ruling on preliminary issues found that Markandan & Uddin, a firm of east London solicitors, was in breach of trust because it had paid out nearly £750,000 to fraudsters purporting to be solicitors for the vendor without having received the documents necessary to register title or having received a solicitor’s undertaking to provide such documents. There was no allegation that the firm was involved in the fraud.

Roger Wyand QC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge in the case, Lloyds TSB Bank PLC v Markandan & Uddin [2010] EWHC 2840 (Ch), ruled that the defendants were not entitled to relief under the Trustee Act 1925 because although they had acted honestly, they had not acted reasonably. Not only had the firm failed to obtain the necessary documents, but it had paid the money into a second account at the request of the purported solicitors for the vendor.

Furthermore, the judge said, the defendants had failed to establish properly that the purported firm had an office where it claimed to have one – which is specifically required by section A3.2 of the Council of Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook.

He said that the recoverable loss by the lender was the entire advance.

The case is likely to lead mortgage lenders who are the victims of fraud to consider claims of breach of trust when they seek to recover their losses from solicitors. If a lender can show a breach of trust, then it need not prove negligence by the buyer’s solicitor. In the past many cases seeking to prove negligence have failed due to the high standard of proof required.

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


What challenges will the Bar face in the next five years?

As we look towards the end of 2021 and at how the Bar has adapted to the harsh realities of the pandemic, the question beckons as to what the future holds.


The rise of cyber-criminal threat for law firms since Covid-19

The global coronavirus pandemic, and the rise in people working from home, has unfortunately provoked a growth in cyber-crime. The UK government estimates that the cost of cyber-crime is £27bn per annum.


How to ensure your ATE cover is adequate security for costs

When does an after-the-event insurance policy provide adequate security for a defendant’s costs? The short answer is that it very much depends on the wording of the particular policy.


Loading animation