Solicitors convicted of fraud ordered to repay £205,000


Ayaz Siddique

Two solicitors who were jailed for stealing thousands of pounds from their firm have now been ordered to pay back more than £200,000.

Ayaz Siddique, 49, and Deepankar Dixit, 39, previously worked at Kingstons Solicitors in Newcastle, which closed in 2016 and was then intervened in by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) last month.

Northumbria Police said the pair used “a range of deceptive and co-ordinated tactics to fraudulently steal thousands of pounds by funnelling money into a cash account they kept outside the business where Siddique was a director”.

They were convicted in December 2019 of false accounting, contrary to the Theft Act 1968. Mr Siddique was also convicted of committing an act or series of acts with an intent to pervert the course of justice. Both were sentenced to two years and three months in prison.

The North East Regional Economic Crime Unit then looked at their financial activity prior to the offending, assessed the value of their assets and calculated what value each man had illegally obtained through their criminal activity, with a view to taking action under the Proceeds of Crime Act.

Deepankar Dixit
Both photos courtesy of Northumbria Police

Appearing at Leeds Crown Court last week, a judge issued confiscation orders requiring them to pay back £205,000 or possibly face further time in jail.

Detective Sergeant Thomas Maughan said: “Both Siddique and Dixit showed a blatant disregard for their professional obligations. Each of them acted outside the law and have now lost their status as solicitors.

“This has been months of hard work by an incredibly persistent and committed team of fraud and financial investigators and I want to thank them all for their contributions that have led to this successful outcome at court.”

The two solicitors are now also facing hearings at the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.




Blog


Does AI work for conveyancers? We asked those on the front line

What is the view on AI from conveyancers themselves? Based on a Dye & Durham’s roundtable discussion on AI, the answer is: it depends.


Is the legal profession ready for agentic AI?

An AI agent is difficult to supervise. By design, it works in the background. It means a solicitor can be held responsible for work they had no real means to oversee.


Why firms stall in adopting AI and how to unlock real progress

If your firm is hesitating on AI, it’s almost never the technology that’s in the way. What stalls adoption is everything that surrounds the tool.


Loading animation