Solicitors’ community interest company to donate all profits to charity


Laura van Ree

Two private client solicitors have launched a community interest company (CIC) that will donate all of its profits to charity.

Not for Profit Law in Norwich will give its profits to Norfolk Community Foundation, which supports small charities and voluntary groups across the county.

Laura van Ree and Trina Worden will use the foundation’s offices when face-to-face meetings are required; it will also promote their services across its network.

The pair met while working at East Anglia law firm Fosters, where Ms van Ree was head of the wills, trust and probate department.

She later worked at another leading firm in the region, Birketts, but told Legal Futures that – having begun her career in the charity sector – she decided that she did not like working in a big corporate law firm environment and wanted to give more back to the community “rather than a few people at the top”.

She approached Ms Worden who said: “I thought it was such a fabulous idea that I came on board in about half an hour.” Ms van Ree added: “Giving back was something missing from our working lives.”

The CIC takes advantage of the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) Standards & Regulations by allowing the pair to practise as solicitors while not operating from a regulated business.

As a non-commercial body, it is permitted under the Legal Services Act 2007 to provide reserved legal activities; the company, regulated by the Community Interest Company Regulator, has professional indemnity insurance.

Trina Worden

Though there is nothing to stop an SRA-regulated law firm donating all of its profits to charity, Ms van Ree said that, as a CIC, it had no choice but to do so.

The solicitors welcomed the greater freedom to choose what type of business they worked from; as private client lawyers competing with will-writers and accountants for probate work, “sticking with a very traditional business structure and being regulated in the way they are makes us less competitive”, Ms van Ree said.

There has been a strong positive reaction from contacts and potential clients, the solicitors reported, suggesting that the mood of the public had shifted as a result of the pandemic.




    Readers Comments

  • Terri Brookes says:

    This is fantastic to see but I am curious about the set up. Why not just set up a charity if 100% of profits are to be given away? As technically this is not possible running a CIC as you do not get the same tax breaks. The CIC will need to pay corporation tax on all profits before distributing it to charity and all regulated persons need to be deemed employees and thus paid a wage of sorts so income tax etc also needs to be paid if eligible. Also, with the way SRA compliant insurance is set up, for the cic to be regulated, should the company ever close it will need to pay 6 years run off insurance prior to any money going to its asset locks which technically could leave no money going to its asset locks at all and defeating the purpose of the CIC. Where as setting up a charity, I believe, would technically avoid most of the above.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Embracing the future: Navigating AI in litigation

Whilst the UK courts have shown resistance to change over time, in the past decade they have embraced the use of some technologies that naturally improve efficiency. Now we’re in the age of AI.


A sorry tale of two conveyances

In a first for this website, Mrs Legal Futures has written a blog. All the lawyers have been named after Teletubbies, partly for privacy but mostly for petty revenge.


Combatting discrimination caused by algorithms requires a uniform approach

As we see more and more decision-making responsibilities once entrusted solely to humans now delegated to automated systems, we are also observing a rise in algorithmic discrimination.


Loading animation