Solicitors “coercing” hospital patients into signing legal papers


Hospital wards: Staff warned about solicitor visits

Solicitors have been accused of visiting vulnerable patients in hospital wards in Leeds and “coercing” them into signing legal documents.

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (LTHT) – which controls seven hospitals, including Leeds Genera Infirmary – did not say where the events occurred.

But an email to staff from its safeguarding team said: “LTHT Adult Safeguarding have been alerted about incidents whereby solicitors are attending wards (with persons alleging to be patient relatives) and coercing patients who do not have the capacity to consent to signing documents.

“All staff have a duty to challenge anyone attending a ward who does not have a valid reason to be there, or who staff feel are not acting in patients’ best interests.”

In a statement, Deputy Chief Nurse Helen Christodoulides added: “We have robust and well-embedded safeguarding processes within the trust.

“Through these we were alerted to two unrelated incidents where ward staff were concerned that legal paperwork was being discussed with patients in our care deemed not to have capacity to take part in these discussions.

“We’ve contacted the families of those affected and raised the issue with relevant staff. We have also raised this concern with appropriate external authorities and our partners.”

A spokesman for the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) was unable to say whether it had received complaints from the trust.

He added: “Solicitors have an obligation not to take advantage of clients or others, and should not make approaches to potential clients without being invited. If the hospital trust or anyone else has evidence of solicitors doing this, we would urge them to report it to us.”

It was only at the end of June that the SRA issued a guidance note on accepting instructions from vulnerable clients or third parties acting on their behalf, a few days after a report from the Legal Services Board found that vulnerable clients were being disadvantaged by the “cold, clinical and chaotic manner” in which they were treated by some lawyers.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


GEO – the impact of AI on digital marketing for law firms

GEO represents the biggest change in online business generation that I can remember. You cannot afford to stick with the same old engine optimisation techniques.


What the law can learn from fintech’s onboarding revolution

Client onboarding has always been slow. It’s not just about the paperwork and manual workflows; it’s also about those long AML checks and verifications.


Civil enforcement – progress at last with CJC report

‘When do I get my money?’ is a question that litigators acting for successful parties are used to fielding. The value of judgments is of course in the recovery made.


Loading animation