Solicitor struck off for role in Ponzi scheme


Pickard: Motivated by greed

A solicitor jailed for his role in a Ponzi scheme – in which he used his professional credentials to persuade people to invest– has been struck off.

Stephen Charles Pickard, formerly of Leeds firm Lupton Fawcett, is currently serving an eight-year prison sentence, which was imposed in November 2016.

The sentencing judge, His Honour Judge Kearl QC in Leeds Crown Court, found Pickard to be the main fraudster’s “lieutenant”, saying that he was vital to the fraud and “provided respectability through your then solicitors’ firm, whose name you have dragged through the mire”

The judge said the fraudulent schemes had “left people suffering from stress-related illnesses, anxiety, clinical depression, feeling suicidal, having to change their lifestyles, worrying about their houses and some selling their homes”.

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal said Pickard’s misconduct “had caused colossal harm to members of the public and the reputation of the profession”.

Striking him off, the tribunal said he was motivated by “greed and desire for personal financial gain”, it concluded.

Pickard was born in 1959 and qualified in 1986. He helped serial fraudster Keith Wharton – who was jailed for 12 years – run a scheme that falsely promised a huge return on investment.

Pickard acted as Wharton’s gatekeeper and was used to give credibility to the scheme, making false claims about Wharton’s track record and wealth.

Between early 2010 and August 2010 around a dozen investors put £1.7m into the scheme. A further scheme was then launched in 2011 and another six investors were conned into handing over a further £500,000.

Pickard was convicted on three counts of dishonestly making a false representation to make gain for himself and/or another or cause loss to others/expose others to risk, and one count of concealing, disguising, converting, transferring, or removing criminal property.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Embracing the future: Navigating AI in litigation

Whilst the UK courts have shown resistance to change over time, in the past decade they have embraced the use of some technologies that naturally improve efficiency. Now we’re in the age of AI.


A sorry tale of two conveyances

In a first for this website, Mrs Legal Futures has written a blog. All the lawyers have been named after Teletubbies, partly for privacy but mostly for petty revenge.


Combatting discrimination caused by algorithms requires a uniform approach

As we see more and more decision-making responsibilities once entrusted solely to humans now delegated to automated systems, we are also observing a rise in algorithmic discrimination.


Loading animation