Solicitor struck off for role in Ponzi scheme


Pickard: Motivated by greed

A solicitor jailed for his role in a Ponzi scheme – in which he used his professional credentials to persuade people to invest– has been struck off.

Stephen Charles Pickard, formerly of Leeds firm Lupton Fawcett, is currently serving an eight-year prison sentence, which was imposed in November 2016.

The sentencing judge, His Honour Judge Kearl QC in Leeds Crown Court, found Pickard to be the main fraudster’s “lieutenant”, saying that he was vital to the fraud and “provided respectability through your then solicitors’ firm, whose name you have dragged through the mire”

The judge said the fraudulent schemes had “left people suffering from stress-related illnesses, anxiety, clinical depression, feeling suicidal, having to change their lifestyles, worrying about their houses and some selling their homes”.

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal said Pickard’s misconduct “had caused colossal harm to members of the public and the reputation of the profession”.

Striking him off, the tribunal said he was motivated by “greed and desire for personal financial gain”, it concluded.

Pickard was born in 1959 and qualified in 1986. He helped serial fraudster Keith Wharton – who was jailed for 12 years – run a scheme that falsely promised a huge return on investment.

Pickard acted as Wharton’s gatekeeper and was used to give credibility to the scheme, making false claims about Wharton’s track record and wealth.

Between early 2010 and August 2010 around a dozen investors put £1.7m into the scheme. A further scheme was then launched in 2011 and another six investors were conned into handing over a further £500,000.

Pickard was convicted on three counts of dishonestly making a false representation to make gain for himself and/or another or cause loss to others/expose others to risk, and one count of concealing, disguising, converting, transferring, or removing criminal property.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

11 November 2019

Taking a strategic approach to cyber-risk

If you forced 10 cyber-criminals to sit through an average law firm’s IT committee meeting, they’d be turning themselves in to the National Crime Agency before it reached AOB.

Read More

Loading animation