Solicitor struck off after 40-year career – for the sake of £100

SDT: Solicitor could not explain his thoughts at the time of the misconduct

An experienced conveyancer has been struck off for falsifying the completion date of a transaction in a report to tax authorities in order to avoid a late registration penalty of £100.

John Martyn Lewis, who qualified in 1978, held his hands up to the misconduct, claiming the dishonesty was an “isolated aberration” in an otherwise distinguished career.

Mr Lewis, a solicitor at three-office North Wales and Cheshire firm Allington Hughes, amended a filing made to the Welsh Revenue Authority (WRA) to make the completion date of the transaction less than 30 days earlier.

This avoided making his client – and therefore his firm – liable for a late registration penalty. Returns made more than one day but less than six months late carry a penalty of £100.

The TR1 should have been submitted by 13 January 2019. On 15 January, the solicitor’s secretary had accurately sent in the correct date of completion, namely 14 December 2018.

However, on the same day Mr Lewis contacted the WRA to amend the submission to 18 December, and then instructed his secretary to confirm it.

When confronted by his firm’s compliance officer, Mr Lewis admitted he had “deliberately misled” the authority in an attempt to avoid a penalty charge.

Agreeing an outcome with the Solicitors Regulation Authority – meaning there was no hearing in person – Mr Lewis said he could not explain his thoughts at the time, and accepted there were no extraordinary circumstances.

Approving the strike-off, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal said the sanction was “appropriate and proportionate”.

It said the solicitor had “knowingly and consciously amended the date so as to avoid any penalty” in breach of his professional duties. “Public confidence in the reputation of the profession demanded no lesser punishment”.

Mr Lewis was also ordered to pay costs of £3,000.

    Readers Comments

  • Jill Evans says:

    This is an outrage – Mr Lewis is one of the nicest people on earth, he is everything a solicitor should be , I would put ALL my trust in him, he always has the clients and profession at heart . Stuck off for the sake of £100 , it’s disgusting, there is no justice in the justice service . A great loss from the professional, such a waste.

  • Peter says:

    The Compliance officer needs a reality check.

  • Mark Graham says:

    Very interesting.

  • John says:

    Sorry to hear Mr Lewis has lost his post due to such a small mistake after a faultless 40 year career. We have always found him very helpful and professional

  • john brimelow says:

    This result is absurd and out of all proportion to an upstanding diligent busy upright career of many many years ..His reputation in the area is a very high one and for a relatively minor misdemeanour involving a trivial sum the result out of all proportion to the offence.

  • Dan Bindman says:

    Judging by the comments this solicitor was very well regarded. Unfortunately he was struck off because he deliberately misled the tax authorities to avoid a penalty. Unless there are exceptional reasons, like mental breakdown, extreme stress or similar (in this case the solicitor admitted there were none), the tribunal has no option under its rules but to approve striking off in such circumstances. Such is the tightrope that all solicitors walk. Any slippage is courting professional disaster.

  • Chris Wood says:

    The best solicitor in Wrexham by a mile, gets the job done, he will be greatly missed by all his clients, who have always received excellent service over his forty years in the profession. An absolute disgrace.

  • Alan Bell says:

    Martin Lewis is a Super Star. Brilliant at his job and diligent in his work.


    I have dealt with Martin for over 25 years. What a magnificent servant to the trade he was, and still should be!! I can not praise him high enough, a true gentleman, what a disgrace this is!!

  • I T & S C Davies says:

    My Husband and I are greatly saddened by this, we were given excellent service and his upmost commitment to any job undertaken by him, we always found him to be professional very helpful, a well respected gentleman, he will be greatly missed by us and all his clients.

  • Joy Morgan says:

    Have just read about Martin Lewis losing his job over £!00. The “punishment” seems to be harsh when you compare Martin’s unblemished 40 year record as an excellent solicitor. Martin dealt with a case of mine some years ago. A lovely professional man.

  • Sally Astbury says:

    Wow. What a shock. Just about to call Martin for some info about my mums estate. He was always so helpful and charming and I felt total trust in him. I am saddened by this.

  • Giovanni Melacrinis says:

    Mr Lewis has acted for me for the past 40 years of house buying and selling, and the arrangement of mortgages etc. I have always, absolutely always found him to be of impeccable character, straightforward in his dealings and his advice has always served me well. I am more than sorry that the people on this disciplinary panel do not live in the real world and look at history.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Automated justice: striking the balance in injury claims

No professional sector is immune from automation – even the law. However, the adoption of automated systems to settle routine injury claims raises a number of important ethical questions.

Conveyancers: are you afraid of outsourcing?

For many years, outsourcing has been seen as a bit of a scary prospect within the conveyancing sector. But thanks to the stamp duty holiday, conveyancers are now realising some of the many benefits.

You win some, you lose some – class actions post Google

In November, Google received two court rulings, through which it both closed and opened the door to class actions against it. So what do the decisions mean for future class actions?

Loading animation