Solicitor who sent offensive SEN tweets accepts rebuke


Twitter: late-night tweets led to complaints

Twitter: late-night tweets led to complaints

The solicitor who caused an uproar in June when he sent out a series of tweets appearing to gloat over defeating cases brought by parents of children with special educational needs and disability, has accepted a rebuke from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

The case has been concluded with unusual speed and in a regulatory settlement agreement published today, Mark Small, director of Milton Keynes firm Baker Small, also agreed to pay costs of £600.

Baker Small is a niche firm providing advice to public bodies including schools and local authorities.

Mr Small sent out a message on his firm’s Twitter account on a Saturday night that said: “Crikey, had a great ‘win’ last week which sent some parents into a storm! It is always a great win when the other side thinks they won!”

He then trumpeted a “great ABA win this week” – referring to applied behavioural analysis, a programme to help autistic children – adding: “Interesting to see how parents continue to persist with it. Funny thing is parents think they won ;)”

Several Twitter users sent critical messages in response, and when challenged by one user, the next Baker Small tweet said: “Whenever someone thinks they have won and they have conceded 90% of their case, it does make me smile.”

One user asked for the identity of the sender so she could make a complaint, to which she received this reply: “Dear oh dear complaints policy on our website. Can dish it out but not take a different opinion ;)”

Another user pointed out that while “you can go home and forget, parents of children with SEN live with it 24/7. We seek collaboration not confrontation”. Baker Small replied: “When parental solicitors champion their ‘wins’, they are lauded on Twitter. Double standards I’m afraid.”

The SRA said the tweets generated a number of complaints to the firm and the regulator. The public backlash also led to several local authority clients ending or reviewing their contracts with the firm.

As part of the agreement, Mr Small admitted “that the content of the tweets was unprofessional and offensive and as such he failed to behave in a way that maintains the trust the public places in him and in the provision of legal services”.

In mitigation, Mr Small said that prompt action was taken to delete the tweets and he quickly accepted responsibility for them, a written apology was posted within 24 hours, and a donation was made to a charity.

The SRA said the agreed outcome was appropriate because “the conduct was deliberate or reckless, the agreed outcome is a proportionate outcome in the public interest, [and] the conduct was neither trivial nor justifiably inadvertent”.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

13 November 2019

The October PII renewal: Why the market changed

Since the abolition of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund, the October professional indemnity insurance renewal season has always been a challenge, but this year most law firms saw their premiums go up.

Read More

Loading animation