Solicitor sanctioned for “puerile” social media posts on clients


Social media: Inappropriate comments

A solicitor who repeatedly made “inappropriate and puerile comments” on social media about his clients’ matters, and revealed confidential information, has been rebuked for his conduct.

Harmal Singh Paul also accepted a £1,500 fine from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and has deleted all of his posts.

According to a sanction published yesterday by the SRA, the sole practitioner at Dudley-based Paul & Co made over 130 posts on social media between November 2015 and September 2016 when he attended a police station, prison or court, often stating where he was and the criminal charge he was there to advise on.

In 21 of these posts, Mr Paul added “inappropriate comments or emoji icons”. The SRA gave four examples:

  • “From Attempted Murder at Smethwick” followed by two emojis to depict crying with laughter;
  • “DV [Domestic Violence]…Christmas Coming Up…What you Expect”;
  • “Drugs”. When another person commented “What kind? Lol x”, Mr Paul responded “Not From the Pharmacy That’s For Sure pmsl [piss myself laughing]” followed by various emojis depicting crying with laughter; and
  • “Sexual Assault” followed by two emojis with a sad face and a tear.

In two other posts, Mr Paul disclosed specific, confidential information about a client matter.

Mr Paul admitted that “by posting inappropriate and puerile comments on social media about his clients”, some of which trivialised serious criminal charges, he breached principle 6 of the SRA Principles – “You must behave in a way that maintains the trust the public places in you and in the provision of legal services”.

Disclosing confidential details about client matters also breached principle 6 and failed to achieve outcome 4.1 of the code of conduct, dealing with confidentiality.

The SRA said the sanction “marks the seriousness of Mr Paul’s conduct which was connected with his legal practice, but recognises that there was no lack of integrity”.

In mitigation, Mr Paul said he cooperated with the SRA’s investigation, and has deleted all of the relevant social media posts.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


AI in family law – drawing the line for clients and lawyers

AI is becoming increasingly intertwined with family law. Clients are using it to draft initial enquiries, prepare statements and, in some cases, to support themselves as litigants in person.


Why AI and leadership choices will define law firm profitability in 2026

Despite rapid advances in legal technology, the future of law will not be determined by software alone. It will be shaped by leadership decisions.


Legal director: an alternative to partnership

Firms are increasingly acknowledging the need for alternative senior roles – positions that offer influence and recognition without the obligations of ownership.


Loading animation