Solicitor who “robbed Peter to pay Paul” struck off for mishandling estates


Bristol: firm made report

A former associate at leading Bristol firm Burges Salmon has been struck off for mishandling the estates of deceased clients.

Russell Rollings was originally reported by the firm to the Solicitors Regulation Authority when it discovered what he had been doing, and he was struck off by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) last week.

The SDT heard how he mishandled the payment of monies from client estates a number of times between 2002 and 2012, totaling tens of thousands of pounds, which he then attempted to cover up.

In one example, the SDT was told that, under pressure from an executor, Mr Rollings claimed he had sold shares belonging to an estate when he had not done so. There were insufficient funds in the account to pay all the beneficiaries the supposed proceeds of the share sales, so Mr Rollings took money from another client account to cover the shortfall.

When the original shares were finally sold, they realised more money than Mr Rollings had anticipated, and after restoring funds to the other client account, he improperly used a ‘suspense’ account – an account used for temporarily holding money – to store the excess funds.

Mr Rollings – who subsequently worked for another south-west firm and also sat on the committee of Bristol Law Society – admitted to the allegations of payments on behalf of clients’ estates; using funds improperly taken from other, unrelated, client accounts without his clients’ knowledge or authority; making statements which he knew were untrue; and using a suspense account in circumstances that he could not justify.

He also admitted to dishonesty in four of the allegations. As well as striking him off, the SDT ordered him to pay £16,000 costs.

Gordon Ramsay, SRA director of legal enforcement, said: “When loved ones have passed on, we trust solicitors to carry out their wishes and look after their estates. Mr Rollings failed to respect that position of trust.

“In the end, he was robbing Peter to pay Paul, and making false statements to cover his tracks. We won’t stand for dishonesty in the profession, so we welcome the tribunal’s decision.”

Mr Rollings has 21 days from the SDT’s publication of its judgment to appeal.

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

18 October 2019

Will your staff have confidence in your compliance officers?

The introduction of the SRA Standards and Regulations on 25 November 2019 will see new issues coming into focus for you and your firms over the reporting of serious breaches to the SRA.

Read More

Loading animation