Solicitor reported after personal relationship with witness raises conflict concern


Medway court: solicitor’s actions caused delay

A solicitor acting for a father in a care case has been reported to the Solicitors Regulation Authority after it emerged she was in a personal relationship with a witness.

Her Honour Judge Cameron in Medway Family Court said it was the third occasion such an instance had occurred with the unnamed solicitor.

Her ruling on the care arrangements for three young children outlined considerable concern at the delays that had beset the case.

The judge also noted that there had been “unhelpful” parallel criminal proceedings at which the mother was acquitted of two counts following allegations of shaking the youngest child and attacking her brother, Mr B.

HHJ Cameron said: “For completeness, I recall that matters were somewhat delayed by the revelation that the woman solicitor representing Mr S, the father of the youngest child, was having some sort of relationship with the mother’s brother, Mr B, a witness and intervener in the case which might have produced some sort of confusion and conflict.

“That solicitor, perhaps unwisely, has attended both this court hearing and been seen in the public foyer, and also attended at the Crown Court, presumably to support Mr B. It was necessary therefore for Mr Kenny, Mr S’s counsel, having properly notified the court of this, to receive his professional instructions from a newly appointed solicitor in order to ensure a scrupulously fair article 6 complaint hearing.”

She said the matter was reported to the designated family judge for Kent and also to her court’s High Court family liaison judge. “I gather that some sort of complaint has now been made by the local authority about that solicitor’s conduct.

“Regrettably this is the third occasion to my own direct knowledge when an issue of conflict has arisen through this particular solicitor’s potentially conflictual behaviour in becoming personally close to parties or witnesses.

“I do not need to spend any more time on that issue beyond reflecting that it causes delay by having to have a new solicitor representing a client and also, no doubt, causes extra costs to the legal aid fund.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


BSB entities offer positive future for the Bar
3 August 2020

The chambers of the 17,000 or so practising barristers in England and Wales face, arguably, their greatest time of challenge and controversy since advocates first took up arms in the early 13th century.


My lockdown legacy – what will yours be?
30 July 2020

As we go back to work, we will not – and should not – forget the lessons we learnt during lockdown. I really hope that we drive change as a result and create a positive legacy for our industry.


Loading animation