Solicitor rebuked over referrals from genealogists

Probate: Significant proportion of firm’s work came from genealogist company

A solicitor has been rebuked for taking referrals from a genealogy business that acquired clients in a way that a law firm would be prohibited from doing.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) action against Helen Heselwood is one that has been far more commonly seen against personal injury solicitors.

Ms Heselwood was a director and COLP at Heselwood & Grant in Lytham St Annes, which closed last October, and has accepted the sanction in a regulatory settlement agreement.

The firm was referred a significant proportion of its probate work by a genealogist business, ‘Company A’, which would use information supplied by the government on unclaimed estates to make unsolicited approaches to members of the public who it believed were potential beneficiaries.

The agreement said Heselwood & Grant was aware of Company A’s use of “unsolicited targeted approaches to acquire and introduce members of the public to the firm”, which would then act for the beneficiaries to administer the estate.

Company A’s acquisition and introductions were conducted in a manner that, if it were regulated by the SRA, would be in breach of regulatory requirements. This is a breach of paragraph 5.1(e) of the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors.

Solicitors are not allowed to make unsolicited approaches to consumers.

Ms Heselwood accepted she was in breach. In mitigation, she pointed out that she had co-operated with the SRA’s investigation, “has shown insight and understanding of her regulatory obligations”, and had a clean regulatory history up until now.

The SRA said a rebuke was the appropriate outcome because “some sanction is required to uphold public confidence in the delivery of legal services”, but the risk of repetition was low.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.

NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.

Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.

Loading animation